Cited by

See, e.g., Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , 219 N.W.

Paul, 249 Minn. 53 , Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , 219 N.W.

* * * Any public street or sidewalk used by an employee in leaving or arriving at his employment would as well be a part of the working premises as was the site of this accident, and manifestly such a construction is not possible under the statute.” In Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , 219 N.W.

Paul, 249 Minn. 53 , Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , 219 N.W.

Our approach to the issue of whether the injury arose as a part of the service or during the hours of service has been guided by Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , , and Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , , two of the early and leading decisions which express the spirit and policy of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Co. 151 Minn. 258 , ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 ; Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , .

2 Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491, 495 , ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge, 226 Minn. 141, 145 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255, 258 .

The basic principle as to reasonable time for ingress is set forth in Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , , and needs no discussion here.

such service, at the time *182 of the injury, and during the hours of service as such workmen; * * * » Under this section, the accident, to give rise to a compensable injury, must have occurred on what is referred to as the “working premises.” Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , .

Plaintiff here, unlike the employe in Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , , had not put aside her own independent purpose when she was injured.

Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , ; Le Bar v. Ewald Bros. Dairy, 217 Minn. 16 , 13 N. W. (2d) 729 ; Locke v. County of Steele, 223 Minn. 464 , 27 N. W. (2d) 285 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.

ed in, on, or about the premises where their services are being performed, or where their services require their presence as a part of such service, at the time of the injury, and during the hours of service as such workmen.” Thereunder we have held that the act is not to be given a too restricted construction, either as to “hours of service” or “the premises of the employer,” Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , ; Green v. County of Chippewa, 189 Minn. 627 , ; and that a risk is incidental to em

The cases of Ramczik v. Winona M. & F. Co. 174 Minn. 156 , , and Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , , also cited by the parties, afford very little help because of dissimilarity of the facts from those of the case at bar.

the, section does not “cover workmen except while engaged in, on, or about the premises where their services are being performed, or where their services require their presence as a part of such service, at the time of the injury, and during the hours of service as such workmen.” Defendant maintains that the injury occurred upon “the working premises” of his employer and cites Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , ; Ludwig v. Farmers Shipping Assn. 181 Minn. 90 , ; Lienau v. N. W. Tel.

There, “for all practical purposes,” the place of the accident was “his employer’s premises.” The same feature was present in Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491, 495 , , where the employe granted compensation was considered to have reached her “working premises.” The scene of the accident was not only thereon but “adjacent or appurtenant” to the building wherein she worked and which she was on the very point of entering for work.

Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , ; Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495 , ; Lienau v. N. W. Tel.

Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , ; Cudahy Packing Co. v. Parramore, 263 U. S. 418 , 44 S. Ct. 153 , 68 L. ed. 366, 30 A. L. R. 532; Cudahy Packing Co. v. Industrial Comm.

ator and his fellow servant Grote to be true, that they went up to bring the lumber back when the injury happened, the men would have been engaged in or about the premises where their services were being performed or where their services required their presence as a part of such services, at the time of the injury, within the meaning of G. S. 1923 ( 1 Mason, 1927 ) § 4326(j) ; Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn. 491 , .