Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate of Olson, 223 N.W. 677.

61 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Joseph Michael Tuseth Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Michael Tuseth Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Consequently, an objection that opinion testimony goes to an ultimate issue is, by itself, “not sufficient.” In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 370, 223 N.W.
In Re the Estate of McCue 449 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Estate of McCue 449 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
However, “[d]irect evidence of undue influence is not required and is usually unobtainable because the influence is rarely exercised openly in the presence of oth *513 ers.” In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 365 , 223 N.W.
In Re the Estate of Opsahl 448 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Estate of Opsahl 448 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
19, 1986) (citing In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 365 , 223 N.W.
State v. Mitjans 408 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1987
State v. Mitjans 408 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1987
6 *831 Wigmore, Evidence % 1810 n. 2 (Chadbourn Rev. 1976); In Re Olson’s Estate, 176 Minn. 360 , 223 N.W.
In Re the Estate of Ristau 399 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Estate of Ristau 399 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 365 , 223 N.W.
In Re Estate of Larson 394 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Estate of Larson 394 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 365 , 223 N.W.
Matter of Estate of Anderson 379 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Estate of Anderson 379 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 365 , 223 N.W.
In Re Estate of Jenks 189 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1971
Carter v. First Trust Co. 189 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1971
Carter v. First Trust Co. 189 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1971
This point is controlled by our statement in In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 370 , , 681: “* * * While in a will contest the opinion of a witness, lay or scientific, should not be asked as to the testator’s capacity to make a valid will, there is certainly no objection to questions *145 concerning Ms ability to comprehend his property and dispose of it understanding^.” See, also
In Re Estate of Jenks 189 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1971
This point is controlled by our statement in In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 370 , 223 N.W.
Mayberry v. Davis 178 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1970
Mayberry v. Davis 178 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1970
There, we said, among other things, that the broker “must bring the minds of the buyer and seller to an agreement for a sale and the price and terms upon which it is to be made.” 176 Minn. 360 , .
Truesdale v. Friedman 127 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1964
Truesdale v. Friedman 127 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1964
We pointed out in In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 363 , , that it purposely did not attempt to do so, and went on to say: «* * * it leaves it to counsel and their traditional spirit of fairness *405 and accommodation to shorten the printed records just as much as circumstances will permit without jeopardizing the arguments to be advanced here.” It
State v. McCarthy 104 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1960
State v. McCarthy 104 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1960
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , ; *32 Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180 ; Berg v. Ullevig, 244 Minn. 390 , 70 N. W. (2d) 133 ; Van House v. Canadian Northern Ry.
In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
1 ; In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 365 , 223 N.W.
Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
In re Estate of Geske, 211 Minn. 447, 1 N. W. (2d) 423 ; In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , .
In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , 223 N.W.
Sullivan v. Brown 31 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
Sullivan v. Brown 31 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
In discussing the matter of undue influence in connection with a will, this court said in In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 365 , , 679: “* * * It is necessary that the circumstances relied on to show undue influence be such as ‘taken all together, point unmistakably to the fact that the mind of the testator was subjected to that of some other person, so that the will is that of the latter, and not of the former; mere ground
In Re Estate of Wilson 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
Teschendorf v. Strangeway 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
Teschendorf v. Strangeway 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , ; In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , .
In Re Estate of Wilson 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , 223 N.W.
Kaehler v. Kaehler 18 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1945
Kaehler v. Kaehler 18 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1945
See, Bule VIII (2), Supreme Court Buies of Practice (212 Minn, xli); In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , ; Rice v. Rice, 181 Minn. 176 , .
In Re Estate of Crosby 15 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1944
Crosby v. Hunt 15 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1944
Crosby v. Hunt 15 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1944
In re Will of Pinney, 27 Minn. 280 , ; In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , .
In Re Estate of Crosby 15 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1944
791 ; In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , 223 N.W.
Pihlstrom v. Bergquist 1 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1941
In Re Estate of Bergquist 1 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1941
Pihlstrom v. Bergquist 1 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1941
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360, 365 , .
In Re Estate of Bergquist 1 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 1941
In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , 365 , 223 N.W.
In Re Estate of Stephens 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
Cole v. Healy 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
Cole v. Healy 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
Amongst the many cases to which reference might be made the following are particularly helpful: Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; In re Estate of Keeley, 167 Minn. 120 , ; and In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , .
In Re Estate of Stephens 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
535 ; and In re Estate of Olson, 176 Minn. 360 , 223 N.W.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by