Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Zywicki, 221 N.W. 900.

32 citing documents.

State v. Stewart 486 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Stewart 486 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
627 (1950); State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508, 513-14 , 221 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Tahash 142 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Tahash 142 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1966
1 The procedure under the Habitual Criminal Act in force at the time the defendant was sentenced was outlined in State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508, 514 , , and it was pointed out: “* * * It [the Habitual Criminal Act] contains mandatory provisions requiring the county attorney to proceed thereunder when it shall appear that the defendant has been previously convicted.
State Ex Rel. Hines v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1962
State Ex Rel. Hines v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 399 Minn. 1962
2 State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , .
State ex rel. Hoffman v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1962
State ex rel. Hoffman v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1962
MacMillen v. Utecht, 221 Minn. 138 , 21 N. W. (2d) 239 ; State v. Zy-wicki, [ 175 Minn. 508 , ], Although the sentence imposed here, after reciting petitioner’s conviction of the crime of robbery in the first degree by the verdict of the jury and his previous convictions of the two prior felonies, does state that ‘it is the judgment of the court that as punishment for those crimes that you be s
State Ex Rel. La Rose v. Tahash 115 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1962
State Ex Rel. La Rose v. Tahash 115 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1962
Hansen v. Utecht, *561 230 Minn. 579 , 40 N. W. (2d) 441 ; State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , .
State Ex Rel. Christopherson v. Tahash 111 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. Christopherson v. Tahash 111 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1961
State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , .
State Ex Rel. Hansen v. Rigg 104 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1960
Explained State Ex Rel. Hansen v. Rigg 104 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1960
In State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508, 510 , , we explained: “* * * The information presented to the court for the purpose of showing prior convictions is not an indictment or information charging the defendant with having committed a crime.
State v. Benjamin 99 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1959
State v. Benjamin 99 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1959
In State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508, 510 , , we said: “* * * He [the defendant] must be informed of his right to a trial as to the truth of the charge.
State v. Pederson 88 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1958
State v. Pederson 88 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1958
State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , .
State Ex Rel. Savage v. Rigg 84 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1957
State Ex Rel. Savage v. Rigg 84 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1957
In State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508, 510 , , we said: “* * * When the information [charging a defendant with prior convictions] is filed defendant is brought before the court and the information read to him, and he is required to say whether or not he has been convicted as charged in the information; in other words, to plead thereto.
Dixon v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 926 Minn. 1954
Dixon v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 926 Minn. 1954
449; State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , ; State ex rel.
Breeding v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1954
Breeding v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1954
MacMillen v. Utecht, 221 Minn. 138 , 21 N. W. (2d) 239 ; State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , .
Shaw v. Utecht 43 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1950
Shaw v. Utecht 43 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1950
The present statute enacted in 1927, however, “does away with the necessity of charging prior convictions in the information or indictment for the later crime” (State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508, 513 , ), and provides in effect that an accused should not be tried on accusations of prior convictions until after he has been convicted of his last offense.
Willoughby v. Utecht 27 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1947
Willoughby v. Utecht 27 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1947
State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , ; McDonald v. Massachusetts, 180 U. S. 311 , 21 S. Ct. 389 , 45 L. ed. 542; 25 Am.
State Ex Rel. MacMillen v. Utecht 21 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1945
State Ex Rel. MacMillen v. Utecht 21 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1945
See, *143 State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , , wherein are cited State v. Findling, 123 Minn. 413 , , 49 L.R.A.
State v. West 221 N.W. 903 Minn. 1928
State v. West 221 N.W. 903 Minn. 1928
All questions presented for review in this case have been decided adversely to defendant in the decision in State v. Zywicki, 175 Minn. 508 , , except as hereinafter stated- Defendant here contends that the evidence of identity was insufficient; that the evidence was insufficient to justify the jury in finding beyond a reasonable doubt that he was the same person named in the records of the prior convictions shown.