DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Potvin v. Potvin, 224 N.W. 461.

27 citing documents.

  • U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
  • U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
    Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458 , Meiners v. Kennedy, 221 Minn. 6, 8 , Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53, 54 , 224 N.W.
  • Gruenhagen v. Larson 246 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1976
  • Gruenhagen v. Larson 246 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1976
    Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , Meiners v. Kennedy, 221 Minn. 6 , 20 * Laabs v. Hagen, 221 Minn. 89
  • Hartman v. Blanding's Inc. 181 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1970
  • Hartman v. Blanding's Inc. 181 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1970
    Heise v. The J. R. Clark Co. 245 Minn. 179 , 71 N. W. (2d) 818 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , .
  • Liebsch v. Abbott 122 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1963
  • Liebsch v. Abbott 122 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1963
    Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. *457 135, 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , .
  • Barrett v. MacDonald 121 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1963
  • Olson v. Mullen 68 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1955
  • Olson v. Mullen 68 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1955
    Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , ; Hickman v. Sutherland, 222 Minn. 161 , 23 N. W. (2d) 593 .
  • Lee v. Delmont 36 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1949
  • Lee v. Delmont 36 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1949
    8 Schreiber v. Scott, 163 Minn. 422 , ; Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , ; Elton v. N. W. Nat.
  • Erickson v. Sinykin 26 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1947
  • Erickson v. Sinykin 26 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1947
    Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , ; Meiners v. Kennedy, 221 Minn. 6 , 20 N. W. (2d) 539 ; Laabs v. Hagen, 221 Minn. 89 , 21 N. W. (2d) 91 .
  • Venier v. Forbes 25 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1946
  • Venier v. Forbes 25 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1946
    Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , ; Meiners v. Kennedy, 221 Minn. 6 , 20 N. W. (2d) 539 ; Laabs v. Hagen, 221 Minn. 89 , 21 N. W. (2d) 91 .
  • Maust v. Maust 23 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1946
  • Maust v. Maust 23 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1946
    As stated in Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , : “On appeal from a judgment after trial by the court, no motion for a new trial having been made and no errors in rulings or proceedings at the trial being involved, the questions for review are limited to a consideration of whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings
  • Meiners v. Kennedy 20 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1945
  • Meiners v. Kennedy 20 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1945
    So, also, in Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , , we held: “On appeal from a judgment after trial by the court, no motion for a new trial having been made and no errors in rulings or proceedings at the trial being involved, the questions for review are limited to a consideration of whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such
  • Calich v. Consul of the Kingdom 8 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
  • Calich v. Consul of the Kingdom 8 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
    Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , ; Taylor v. Northern States Power Co. 196 Minn. 22 , .
  • Adjustment Service Bureau, Inc. v. Buelow 265 N.W. 659 Minn. 1936
  • Adjustment Service Bureau, Inc. v. Buelow 265 N.W. 659 Minn. 1936
    Hrdlicka v. Haberman, 140 Minn. 124 , ; Pittsburgh P. G. Co. v. Brown, 152 Minn. 325 , ; Cincinnati T. R. Co. v. Loe, 152 Minn. 374 , ; LeMieux v. Cosgrove, 155 Minn. 353 , ; Peterson v. Township of Manchester, 162 Minn. 486 , ; Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , ; Barrett v. Smith, 185 Minn. 596 , .
  • Barrett v. Smith 242 N.W. 392 Minn. 1932
  • Barrett v. Smith 242 N.W. 392 Minn. 1932
    1011 ; Potvin v. Potvin, 177 Minn. 53 , 224 N.W.