Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp., 225 N.W. 911.

25 citing documents.

State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
State v. Meany 115 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1962
Co. 111 Minn. 370 , ; Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , ; and Wiseman v. N. P. Ry.
Nyquist v. Batcher 51 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1952
Nyquist v. Batcher 51 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1952
Co. 165 Minn. 475, 477 , ; Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579, 582 , ; Thornton Bros. Co. v. Reese, 188 Minn. 5, 7 , .
Harding v. Ohio Casualty Insurance 41 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1950
Harding v. Ohio Casualty Insurance 41 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1950
Co. 214 Minn. 101 , 7 N. W. (2d) 672 ; Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , ; 1 Pirsig’s Dunnell, Minn. Pl.
Robinson v. Butler 33 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1948
Robinson v. Butler 33 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1948
County of Morrison v. Babcock, 161 Minn. 80 , ; McGuigan v. Allen, 165 Minn. 390 , ; Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , .
Vogt v. Ganlisle Holding Co. 15 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1944
Vogt v. Ganlisle Holding Co. 15 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1944
B. & T. Co. 193 Minn. 333 , ; Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , ; Wiseman v. N. P. Ry.
Wiseman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 7 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1943
Wiseman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 7 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1943
Co. 111 Minn. 370 , ; Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , .
McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co. 287 N.W. 857 Minn. 1939
McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co. 287 N.W. 857 Minn. 1939
258, citing Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , 225 N.W.
Seidel v. Nicollet Avenue Properties Corp. 279 N.W. 570 Minn. 1938
Distinguished Seidel v. Nicollet Avenue Properties Corp. 279 N.W. 570 Minn. 1938
With reference to the cases plaintiff cites as sustaining his right to a common-law action for damages notwithstanding his election to receive the benefits of the workmen’s compensation act, it may be said that Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , , is plainly distinguishable from the one at bar.
Smith v. Kedney Warehouse Co. Inc. 267 N.W. 478 Minn. 1936
Anderson v. Interstate Power Co. 263 N.W. 612 Minn. 1935
Anderson v. Interstate Power Co. 263 N.W. 612 Minn. 1935
The case at bar falls within the rule of Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , .
Horgen v. Franklin Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n 262 N.W. 149 Minn. 1935
Horgen v. Franklin Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n 262 N.W. 149 Minn. 1935
2 See also Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , ; Duus v. Duus, 181 Minn. 232 , ; Liggett & Meyers Tobacco Co. v. DeParcq (C. C. A.) 66 F. (2d) 678.
Thornton Bros. Co. v. Reese 246 N.W. 527 Minn. 1933
Thornton Bros. Co. v. Reese 246 N.W. 527 Minn. 1933
Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , , and cases cited.
Boek v. Wong Hing 231 N.W. 233 Minn. 1930
Boek v. Wong Hing 231 N.W. 233 Minn. 1930
City of Red Wing v. Eichinger, 163 Minn. 54 , ; Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp. 177 Minn. 579 , .