Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22, 225 N.W. 292.

18 citing documents.

Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda 789 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2010
of Virginia, No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , 449, , 298 (1929), we have stated that “negligence is not necessarily one of the material elements of either trespass or nuisance,” H. Christiansen & Sons v. City of Duluth, 225 Minn. 475, 480
Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004
of Virginia, 177 Minn. 446 , 449, , 293 (1929) (adopting the rule of nonli-ability to a nuisance claim and noting that, with respect to the liability of counties, towns, and school districts, case law has made no distinction between nonliability for negligence and nuisance except when the tort causes injury to private property rights).
Highview North Apartments v. County of Ramsey 323 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1982
Highview North Apartments v. County of Ramsey 323 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1982
See Randall, supra; H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Duluth, 225 Minn. 475 , Mokovich v. Independent School District No. 22, 177 Minn. 446
Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12 138 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1965
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , , and other cases cited in 17 Dunnell, Dig.
Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621 118 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1962
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , .
Reierson v. City of Minneapolis 118 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 1962
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , ; Emmons v. City of Virginia, 152 Minn. 295 , , 29 A. L. R. 860; Nissen v. Redelack, 246 Minn. 83 , 74 N. W. (2d) 300 , 55 A. L. R. (2d) 1428.
Randall v. Village of Excelsior 103 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1960
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , 449, , 293, we noted that the distinction between “negligence” and “nuisance” is not clearly defined and said: “* * * There may be instances where a nuisance is created or exists without negligence as its primary cause.
In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn County 246 Minn. 96 Minn. 1956
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , .
Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44 74 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1956
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , .
Sawaya v. Tucson High School District No. 1 281 P.2d 105 Ariz. 1955
H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of Duluth 31 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1948
177 Minn. 446 , 449, , 293, we stated: “The distinction between negligence and nuisance is not clearly defined.
Lyman v. Hermann 280 N.W. 862 Minn. 1938
177 Minn. 446 , 449, , 293: “Generally a nuisance presupposes negligence, and the maintenance thereof is usually negligence.
Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District 277 N.W. 208 Minn. 1938
177 Minn. 446 , 448, 449, .
Storti v. Town of Fayal 261 N.W. 463 Minn. 1935
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , , 294.
Borwege v. City of Owatonna 251 N.W. 915 Minn. 1933
177 Minn. 446 , , and Bang v. Independent Sch.
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , ; Allen v. Independent School Dist.
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
No. 22, 177 Minn. 446 , ; Allen v. Independent School Dist.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by