Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc., 225 N.W. 428.

36 citing documents.

Nelson v. Harder Royal Breeders, Inc. 187 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1971
Nelson v. Harder Royal Breeders, Inc. 187 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1971
all of which are distinguishable: Stahl v. Patrick, 206 Minn. 413 , (employee injured while cutting wood — employed by retired farmers who had embarked on a distinct business of dealing in wood); Klein v. McCleary, 154 Minn. 498 , (employee injured while clearing land on summer resort tract — land owned by farmer employer); Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , (employee injured while en route between potato field and warehouse — hired by potato dealer to work in warehous
Cosgriff v. Duluth Firemen's Relief Assn. 46 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1951
Cosgriff v. Duluth Firemen's Relief Assn. 46 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1951
See, Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co. 214 Minn. 548 , 9 N. W. (2d) *240 237; Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331, 337 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812, 815 ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , .
Ohlsen v. J. G. Dill Co. 23 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1946
Ohlsen v. J. G. Dill Co. 23 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1946
See, Henry v. D. A. Odell Motor Car Co. 191 Minn. 92 , ; Jeffers v. Borgen Chevrolet Co. 199 Minn. 348 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , .
Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; 23 Minn. L. Rev. 78 ; Schoewe v. Winona P. & G. Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , ; Smith v. Mason Bros. Co. 174 Minn. 94 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Tomhave v. Galena, 180 Minn. 289 , ; Reinhard v. Universal Film Exchange, Inc. 197 Minn. 371 , ; Hill v. Umbehocker, 201 Minn. 569 , ; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; Lunde v. Congoleum-Nairn, Inc. 211 Minn. 487
Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co. 9 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1943
Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 6 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1942
Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 6 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1942
Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , .
Stahl v. Patrick 288 N.W. 854 Minn. 1939
Stahl v. Patrick 288 N.W. 854 Minn. 1939
*415 Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , .
Merchants Trust Co. v. G. Sommers & Co. 274 N.W. 175 Minn. 1937
Bronson v. National Battery Broadcasting Co. Inc. 273 N.W. 681 Minn. 1937
Bronson v. National Battery Broadcasting Co. Inc. 273 N.W. 681 Minn. 1937
Of the many cases cited by relator it is sufficient to note Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Henry v. D. A. Odell Motor Car Co. 191 Minn. 92 , ; Nehring v. Minnesota M. & M. Co. 193 Minn. 169 , .
Whalen v. Buchman 273 N.W. 678 Minn. 1937
Whalen v. Buchman 273 N.W. 678 Minn. 1937
We regard the following decisions as justifying the finding: Austin v. Leonard, Crossett Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , 225 N.W.
Erickson v. Great Northern Railway Co. 253 N.W. 770 Minn. 1934
Erickson v. Great Northern Railway Co. 253 N.W. 770 Minn. 1934
The case of Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , , is not of aid to plaintiff.
Kelley v. the Northwest Paper Co. 251 N.W. 274 Minn. 1933
Kelley v. the Northwest Paper Co. 251 N.W. 274 Minn. 1933
See Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , .
Hebranson v. Fairmont Creamery 245 N.W. 138 Minn. 1932
Hebranson v. Fairmont Creamery 245 N.W. 138 Minn. 1932
Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Peterson v. Farmers State Bank, 180 Minn. 40 , .
Johnston v. W. S. Nott Co. 236 N.W. 466 Minn. 1931
Johnston v. W. S. Nott Co. 236 N.W. 466 Minn. 1931
And see Bookman v. Lyle C. & R. E. Co. 153 Minn. 479 , ; Behr v. Soth, 170 Minn. 278 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , , and cases cited.
Ludwig v. Farmers Shipping Assn. 231 N.W. 803 Minn. 1930
Ludwig v. Farmers Shipping Assn. 231 N.W. 803 Minn. 1930
566 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , .
Tomhave v. Galena 230 N.W. 652 Minn. 1930
Tomhave v. Galena 230 N.W. 652 Minn. 1930
Co. v. District Court, 132 Minn. 249 , ; Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464 , ; Klein v. McCleary, 154 Minn. 498 , ; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , ; Reardon v. City of Austin, 174 Minn. 359 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Tschida v. Bratt, 179 Minn. 277 , 228 N W. 935.
Walker v. Wading 230 N.W. 274 Minn. 1930
Walker v. Wading 230 N.W. 274 Minn. 1930
Charpentier v. Cumming, 178 Minn. 519 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , .
Peterson v. Farmers State Bank 230 N.W. 124 Minn. 1930
Peterson v. Farmers State Bank 230 N.W. 124 Minn. 1930
That is what is meant by the statement that it is “the character of the work which the employe is hired to perform which is the test of whether the employe is a farm laborer.” Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503, 507 , .
Hedquist v. Peter Sundquist & Co. 227 N.W. 856 Minn. 1929
Hedquist v. Peter Sundquist & Co. 227 N.W. 856 Minn. 1929
Reardon v. City of Austin, 174 Minn. 359 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Martin v. Northern Cooperage Co. 178 Minn. 279 , .