Cited by

Plain-' tiff’s own testimony presents a clearer case of contributory negligence than in Rosenau v. Peterson, 147 Minn. 95 , ; DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , ; Reddy v. Rex Oil Co. 182 Minn. 139 , .

DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , ; Chandler v. Buchanan, 173 Minn. 31 , .

DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , ; Tegels v. Tegels, 177 Minn. 222 , ; Robertson v. Spitler, 153 Minn. 395 , ; 3 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.

A quite full statement of the facts has been necessary because the cases of DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , ; Chandler v. Buchanan, 173 Minn. 31 , ; and Sorenson v. Sanderson, 176 Minn. 299 , , are relied upon by appellants.

See Sorenson v. Sanderson, 176 Minn. 299 , ; DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , .

*284 Sorenson v. Sanderson, 17C Minn. 299, , and DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , , were cases of collisions between automobiles in both of which due care on the part of the plaintiffs required them to yield the right of way to the defendants.

On the proposition that defendant Avas entitled to a directed verdict are cited Sorenson v. Sanderson, 176 Minn. 299 , ; DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , ; Weyhe v. Minneapolis St.

The evidence as to what respondent did in the way of looking for approaching cars and his failure to see appellant’s car sooner than he did does not bring this case within the rule laid down in DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , ; Spencer v. Mankato M. W. Co. 180 Minn. 509 , .

Nor do we think it is within DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , .

Co. 166 Minn. 118 , ; Chinander v. DeLaittre, 171 Minn. 11 , ; Chandler v. Buchanan, 173 Minn. 31 , ; Sorenson v. Sanderson, 176 Minn. 299 , ; Rosenthal v. McCulloch, 177 Minn. 523 , ; DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , .

Co. 98 Minn. 205 , ; Sorenson v. Sanderson, 176 Minn. 299 , ; and De Haan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , , are later cases treating of the question.

Such were the cases of Sorenson v. Sanderson, 176 Minn. 299 , ; DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , .