DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sweeney, 231 N.W. 225.

91 citing documents.

  • Criticized State v. Johnson 152 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1967
    See, State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
  • State v. Drews 144 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Drews 144 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1966
    State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; State v. Bock, supra.
  • State v. Klotter 142 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Klotter 142 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1966
    See State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380, for a list of exceptions to the rule.
  • State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
    6 State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
  • State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
    State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; State v. Elli, 267 Minn. 185 , 125 N. W. (2d) 738 .
  • State v. Wofford 114 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1962
  • State v. Wofford 114 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1962
    2 The general rule is set forth in State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , as follows: “The general rule in a criminal case is that evidence which in any manner shows or tends to show that the accused has committed another crime independent of that for which he is on trial is inadmissible.
  • State v. Arradondo 110 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1961
  • State v. Arradondo 110 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1961
    State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
  • State v. Demry 109 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1961
  • State v. Demry 109 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1961
    State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 ; State v. Lucken, 129 Minn. 402 , ; State v. Barrett, 40 Minn. 65 , ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
  • State v. Cunningham 99 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1959
  • State v. Cunningham 99 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1959
    15 State v. Yurkiewicz, 212 Minn. 208 , 3 N. W. (2d) 775 ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
  • State v. Connelly 82 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1957
  • State v. Connelly 82 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1957
    State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
  • State v. DePauw 74 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1955
  • State v. DePauw 74 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1955
    The state relies in the main upon State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380, and cases bearing upon similar situations which have been decided by this court.
  • Keller v. Wolf 58 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1953
  • Keller v. Wolf 58 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1953
    (3 ed.) § 3287; Lepak v. Lepak, 195 Minn. 24 , ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; Dougherty v. Garrick, 184 Minn. 436 , , 77 A. L. R. 1286.
  • State v. Martin 245 P.2d 411 Ariz. 1952
  • State v. Gavle 48 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1951
  • State v. Gavle 48 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1951
    15 State v. Lawlor, 28 Minn. 216 , ; see, State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; State v. Voss, 192 Minn. 127, 129 , .
  • State v. Bock 39 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1949
  • State v. Bock 39 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1949
    State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
  • State v. Peery 28 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 1947
  • State v. Yurkiewicz 3 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1942
  • State v. Yurkiewicz 3 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1942
    Such is the common law.” State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , ,.
  • State v. Tennyson 2 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1942
  • State v. Tennyson 2 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1942
    State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; State v. Smith, 144 Minn. 348 , ; State v. Gesell, 137 Minn. 43 , .
  • State v. Stuart 281 N.W. 299 Minn. 1938
  • State v. Stuart 281 N.W. 299 Minn. 1938
    In State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , 73 A. L. R. 380, we said: “The rule, however, like most rules, has certain exceptions not to be stated categorically but among which evidence of other crimes is admissible to prove the accusation when it tends to establish (1) motive, (2) intent, (3) absence of mistake or accident, (4) the
  • State v. Zabrocki 260 N.W. 507 Minn. 1935
  • State v. Zabrocki 260 N.W. 507 Minn. 1935
    State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 457 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
  • Dougherty v. Garrick 239 N.W. 153 Minn. 1931
  • Dougherty v. Garrick 239 N.W. 153 Minn. 1931
    Co. 133 Minn. 257 , ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380, are examples.
  • State v. Geary 238 N.W. 158 Minn. 1931
  • State v. Geary 238 N.W. 158 Minn. 1931
    Co. 167 Minn. 369 , ; State v. Rosenswieg, 168 Minn. 459 , ; State v. Eaton, 171 Minn. 158 , ; State v. Sweeney 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.