Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Application of Juran, 226 N.W. 201.

49 citing documents.

Doran Development, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 60, 226 N.W.
In the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., for an Order Determining the Boundary … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., for an Order Determining the Boundary … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
However, under section 508.25, “a purchaser of Torrens property who has actual knowledge of a prior, unregistered interest in the property is not a good faith purchaser.” In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 60, 226 N.W.
Merceil Burkhalter v. Dedrick D. Mays, Building Trades Federal Credit Union 877 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Merceil Burkhalter v. Dedrick D. Mays, Building Trades Federal Credit Union 877 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 60, 226 N.W.
In re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. 835 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. 835 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
The Torrens act “abrogates the doctrine of constructive notice except as to matters noted on the certificate of title,” but “does not do away with the effect of actual notice, although it undoubtedly imposes the burden of proving such notice upon the one asserting it.” In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 60 , 226 N.W.
Ruikkie v. Nall 798 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Ruikkie v. Nall 798 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
The Torrens laws established “rules in respect to registered land which differ widely from those which apply in the case of unregistered land.” In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , 226 N.W.
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC 775 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC 775 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
The Torrens Act “does not do away with the effect of actual notice, although it undoubtedly imposes the burden of proving such notice upon the one asserting it.” In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 60 , 226 N.W.
In Re Collier 726 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 2007
In Re Collier 726 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 2007
we further discussed the relationship between actual notice and unregistered interests in Torrens property in In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , 226 N.W.
In Re Collier 711 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Collier 711 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , 226 N.W.
Hersh Properties, LLC v. McDonald's Corp. 588 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1999
Hersh Properties, LLC v. McDonald's Corp. 588 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1999
The purpose of the Torrens system was to create a title registration procedure intended to' simplify conveyancing by eliminating the need to examine extensive abstracts of title by issuance of a single certificate of title, free from “any and all rights or claims not registered with the registrar of titles * * In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , 226 N.W.
Hersh Properties, LLC v. McDonald's Corp. 573 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Hersh Properties, LLC v. McDonald's Corp. 573 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , 226 N.W.
Petition of Willmus 568 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Petition of Willmus 568 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
* * * [I]t does not do away with the effect of actual notice, although it undoubtedly imposes the burden of proving such notice upon the one asserting it.” In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 60 , 226 N.W.
Petition of alchemedes/brookwood, Ltd. 546 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Petition of alchemedes/brookwood, Ltd. 546 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , 226 N.W.
Automated Building Components, Inc. v. New Horizon Homes, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Automated Building Components, Inc. v. New Horizon Homes, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , 226 N.W.
Andrews v. Benson 476 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Andrews v. Benson 476 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
at 869 (quoting In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 60 , 226 N.W.
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban National Bank 460 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban National Bank 460 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Mill City Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Nel *66 son, (“[tjhe purpose of the Torrens law is to establish an indefeasible title free from any and all rights or claims not registered” (citing In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , 226 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Schneider-Kurth 395 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Schneider-Kurth 395 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , 226 N.W.
MILL CITY HEATING & AIR CONDITION. v. Nelson 351 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1984
MILL CITY HEATING & AIR CONDITION. v. Nelson 351 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1984
In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , 226 N.W.
Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
6 Note, also, In re Application of Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , , and the amendment to the Title Registration Act embodied in L. 1931, c. 357.
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co. 129 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1964
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co. 129 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1964
See, In re Application of Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , ; Riley v. Pearson, 120 Minn. 210 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 7.
Kane v. State 55 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1952
Kane v. State 55 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1952
A purchaser may accept this memorial as truly stating the title, and may disregard any claim not so appearing.” In In re Application of Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 58 , , this court defined the purpose of the Torrens law in the following language: “The purpose of the Torrens law is to establish an indefeasible title free from any and all rights or claims not registered with the registrar of titles, with certain unimportant exceptions, to the end that anyone m
Carl v. Detoffol 25 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1946
Carl v. Detoffol 25 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1946
7 Rea v. Kelley, 183 Minn. 194 , ; In re Application of Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , ; Baart v. Mantin, 99 Minn. 197 , , 116 A. S. R. 394.
Armstrong v. Lally 296 N.W. 405 Minn. 1941
Armstrong v. Lally 296 N.W. 405 Minn. 1941
This exception was evidently induced by the decisions of this court in Abrahamson v. Sundman, 174 Minn. 22 , , and In re Application of Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , .
Cook v. Luettich 252 N.W. 649 Minn. 1934
Cook v. Luettich 252 N.W. 649 Minn. 1934
In In re Application of Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , , it was held (syllabus) : .
Rea v. Kelley 235 N.W. 910 Minn. 1931
Rea v. Kelley 235 N.W. 910 Minn. 1931
In In re Application of Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , , the court referred to the provision of § 8294 to the effect that every instrument which affects the title to unregistered land under existing laws, if recorded, shall in like manner affect the title to registered land if filed and registered with the registrar; and, having in view § 8226, held that p
Horgan v. Sargent 233 N.W. 866 Minn. 1930
Horgan v. Sargent 233 N.W. 866 Minn. 1930
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 297, 89 A. S. R. 571; Baart v. Martin, 99 Minn. 197 , , 116 A. S. R. 394; Doyle v. Wagner, 108 Minn. 443 , ; In re Lee, 171 Minn. 182 , ; Abrahamson v. Sundman, 174 Minn. 22 , ; Dennis v. Swanson, 176 Minn. 267 , ; In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55 , .