Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co., 228 N.W. 332.

25 citing documents.

State v. Norgaard 899 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Norgaard 899 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
at 349 (citing Bunten v. E. Minn. Power Co., 178 Minn. 604, 612 , 228 N.W.
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Doyle 778 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Doyle 778 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Bunten v. E. Minn. Power Co., 178 Minn. 604, 612 , 228 N.W.
Vieths v. Ripley 295 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1980
Vieths v. Ripley 295 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1980
Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co., 178 Minn. 604 , 228 N.W.
Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co. 239 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1976
Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co. 239 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1976
See, also, Bunten v. Eastern Minn. Power Co. 178 Minn. 604
Erlandson v. Northern States Power Co. 104 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1960
Erlandson v. Northern States Power Co. 104 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1960
It is set forth in Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co. 178 Minn. 604, 608 , , as follows: “But where an electric company maintains its wires at a height at which they would not come in dangerous proximity to such persons or things as it reasonably ought to anticipate might rightfully come under or near them, it is not chargeable with negligence because someone doing
Anderson v. Northern States Power Co. 52 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1952
Anderson v. Northern States Power Co. 52 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1952
In Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co. *201 178 Minn. 604, 607 , , where many of the cases are collected, we said : “Those engaged in transmitting such a dangerous force as electricity, which gives no warning of its presence and is not apparent to the senses, are required to exercise a degree of care in constructing and maintaining the wires over which it
Knutson v. Lambert 51 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1951
Knutson v. Lambert 51 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1951
t. It is plainly a case of no liability.” In Keep v. Otter Tail Power Co. 201 Minn. 475, 480 , , this court said: “The general rule applicable to those who transmit high voltage electricity is that they must exercise a degree of care to guard against injury commensurate with the danger to be apprehended but are not insurers against injury.” Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co. 178 Minn. 604, 608 , , was a case involving a concrete mixer with an attached boom, which was loaded on a flatcar.
Greenwald v. Northern States Power Co. 32 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1948
Greenwald v. Northern States Power Co. 32 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1948
Schroepfer v. City of Sleepy Eye, 215 Minn. 525 , 10 N. W. (2d) 398 ; Keep v. Otter Tail Power Co. 201 Minn. 475 , ; Faribault v. Northern States Power Co. 188 Minn. 514 , ; Neumann v. Interstate Power Co. 179 Minn. 46 , ; Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co. 178 Minn. 604 , ; 2 Dunnell, Dig.
Schroepfer v. City of Sleepy Eye 10 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1943
Schroepfer v. City of Sleepy Eye 10 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1943
Bunten v. Eastern Minn. Power Co. 178 Minn. 604 , .
Keep v. Otter Tail Power Co. 277 N.W. 213 Minn. 1937
Keep v. Otter Tail Power Co. 277 N.W. 213 Minn. 1937
Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co. 178 Minn. 604 , 608-609 , 228 N.W.
Faribault v. Northern States Power Co. 247 N.W. 680 Minn. 1933
Faribault v. Northern States Power Co. 247 N.W. 680 Minn. 1933
Cloud P. S. Co. 152 Minn. 69 , ; Bunten v. Eastern M. P. Co. 178 Minn. 604 , ; Neumann v. Interstate Power Co. 179 Minn. 46 , ; Weber v. J. E. Barr Packing Corp. 182 Minn. 486 , .
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Compton 8 P.2d 249 Ariz. 1932
Weber v. J. E. Barr Packing Corp. 234 N.W. 682 Minn. 1931
Weber v. J. E. Barr Packing Corp. 234 N.W. 682 Minn. 1931
Cloud P. S. Co. 152 Minn. 69 , ; Bunten v. Eastern Minn. Power Co. 178 Minn. 604 , ; Neumann v. Interstate Power Co. 179 Minn. 46 , .