Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dyste v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank, 229 N.W. 865.

26 citing documents.

Smith v. State 389 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Smith v. State 389 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Dyste v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank of Minneapolis, 179 Minn. 430, 434 , 229 N.W.
Erickson v. Kalman 189 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1971
Erickson v. Kalman 189 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1971
Bank, 179 Minn. 430 , , and most recently followed in Rutchick v. Salute, supra, it is our opinion that the trial court applied the presumption erroneously in this case.
Rutchick v. Salute 179 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1970
Rutchick v. Salute 179 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1970
Kempf v. Kempf 179 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1970
Kempf v. Kempf 179 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1970
Bank, 179 Minn. 430 , ; Hall v. Johnson, 179 Minn. 428 , ; Brennan v. Carroll, 260 Minn. 521 , 111 N. W. (2d) 229 ; Zigan v. LeBlanc, 191 Minn. 538 , ; 38 C. J. S., Gifts, § 50.
O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 167 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1969
O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 167 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1969
Bank, 179 Minn. 430, 435 , .
In Re Estate of Jeruzal 130 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 1964
In Re Estate of Jeruzal 130 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 1964
Bank, 179 Minn. 430 , , 14 Minn. L. Rev. 701 ; and Coughlin v. Farmers & Mechanics Sav.
Brennan v. Carroll 111 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1961
Brennan v. Carroll 111 N.W.2d 229 Minn. 1961
With respect to the joint bank account, defendant argues that the court’s conclusion is incomprehensible when it is realized that there is a presumption in her favor as donee of that gift, citing Dyste v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank, 179 Minn. 430 , .
Vesey v. Vesey 54 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1952
Vesey v. Vesey 54 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1952
Bank, 179 Minn. 430 , , held that in addition to protecting the bank the statute also recognizes that making a deposit in that manner gives to each of the persons named the right to make withdrawals therefrom and gives to the survivor the right to withdraw the residue.
Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
Salscheider v. Holmes 286 N.W. 347 Minn. 1939
Salscheider v. Holmes 286 N.W. 347 Minn. 1939
Coughlin v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank 271 N.W. 168 Minn. 1937
Coughlin v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank 271 N.W. 168 Minn. 1937
Bank, 179 Minn. 430 , ; 2 Mason Minn. St.
Zigan v. Leblanc 254 N.W. 810 Minn. 1934
Zigan v. Leblanc 254 N.W. 810 Minn. 1934
Bank, 179 Minn. 430, 435 , , it was stated: “This statute protects the bank in making such payments.
Hall v. Johnson 229 N.W. 867 Minn. 1930
Hall v. Johnson 229 N.W. 867 Minn. 1930