Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sweeney, 231 N.W. 225.

91 citing documents.

Criticized State v. Johnson 152 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1967
See, State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
State v. Drews 144 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1966
State v. Drews 144 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1966
State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; State v. Bock, supra.
State v. Klotter 142 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1966
State v. Klotter 142 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1966
See State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380, for a list of exceptions to the rule.
State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
6 State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
State v. Sorenson 134 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1965
State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; State v. Elli, 267 Minn. 185 , 125 N. W. (2d) 738 .
State v. Wofford 114 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1962
State v. Wofford 114 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1962
2 The general rule is set forth in State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , as follows: “The general rule in a criminal case is that evidence which in any manner shows or tends to show that the accused has committed another crime independent of that for which he is on trial is inadmissible.
State v. Arradondo 110 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1961
State v. Arradondo 110 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1961
State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
State v. Demry 109 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1961
State v. Demry 109 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1961
State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N. W. (2d) 887 ; State v. Lucken, 129 Minn. 402 , ; State v. Barrett, 40 Minn. 65 , ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
State v. Cunningham 99 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1959
State v. Cunningham 99 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1959
15 State v. Yurkiewicz, 212 Minn. 208 , 3 N. W. (2d) 775 ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
State v. Connelly 82 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1957
State v. Connelly 82 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1957
State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
State v. DePauw 74 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1955
State v. DePauw 74 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1955
The state relies in the main upon State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380, and cases bearing upon similar situations which have been decided by this court.
Keller v. Wolf 58 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1953
Keller v. Wolf 58 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1953
(3 ed.) § 3287; Lepak v. Lepak, 195 Minn. 24 , ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; Dougherty v. Garrick, 184 Minn. 436 , , 77 A. L. R. 1286.
State v. Martin 245 P.2d 411 Ariz. 1952
State v. Gavle 48 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1951
State v. Gavle 48 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1951
15 State v. Lawlor, 28 Minn. 216 , ; see, State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; State v. Voss, 192 Minn. 127, 129 , .
State v. Bock 39 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1949
State v. Bock 39 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1949
State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
State v. Peery 28 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 1947
State v. Yurkiewicz 3 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1942
State v. Yurkiewicz 3 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1942
Such is the common law.” State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , ,.
State v. Tennyson 2 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1942
State v. Tennyson 2 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1942
State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380; State v. Smith, 144 Minn. 348 , ; State v. Gesell, 137 Minn. 43 , .
State v. Stuart 281 N.W. 299 Minn. 1938
State v. Stuart 281 N.W. 299 Minn. 1938
In State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 455 , , 73 A. L. R. 380, we said: “The rule, however, like most rules, has certain exceptions not to be stated categorically but among which evidence of other crimes is admissible to prove the accusation when it tends to establish (1) motive, (2) intent, (3) absence of mistake or accident, (4) the
State v. Zabrocki 260 N.W. 507 Minn. 1935
State v. Zabrocki 260 N.W. 507 Minn. 1935
State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450, 457 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.
Dougherty v. Garrick 239 N.W. 153 Minn. 1931
Dougherty v. Garrick 239 N.W. 153 Minn. 1931
Co. 133 Minn. 257 , ; State v. Sweeney, 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380, are examples.
State v. Geary 238 N.W. 158 Minn. 1931
State v. Geary 238 N.W. 158 Minn. 1931
Co. 167 Minn. 369 , ; State v. Rosenswieg, 168 Minn. 459 , ; State v. Eaton, 171 Minn. 158 , ; State v. Sweeney 180 Minn. 450 , , 73 A. L. R. 380.