Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 232 N.W. 737.
-
Sela Investments, Ltd LLP v. J.H.
Minn. 2026
of Comm’rs, (“It is the well-established law that a litigant may be heard to question the constitutionality of a statute only when and so far as it is being or is about to be applied to his disadvantage.”).
- Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin 451 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1990
-
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin
451 N.W.2d 319
Minn. 1990
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 430 , 232 N.W.
- American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council No. 65 v. State, Public Employment Relations Board 372 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council No. 65 v. State, Public Employment Relations Board
372 N.W.2d 786
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 430 , 232 N.W.
- Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial Hospital 257 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1977
-
Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial Hospital
257 N.W.2d 366
Minn. 1977
Clinton Falls N. Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 430 , 232 N.W.
- City of Marshall v. Public Employees Retirement Ass'n 246 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1976
-
City of Marshall v. Public Employees Retirement Ass'n
246 N.W.2d 572
Minn. 1976
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , we said the better doctrine is that an official charged with the performance of a ministerial duty will not be •allowed to question the constitutionality of the statute which creates his duty, unless the rights of the state or the public interest are involved.
- Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of Brainerd 241 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1976
-
Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of Brainerd
241 N.W.2d 624
Minn. 1976
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 430 , we stated: “* * * The better doctrine supported by the weight of authority is that [a public] official so charged with the performance of a ministerial duty will not be allowed to question the constitutionality of such a law.
- Blue Earth County Welfare Department v. Cabellero 225 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1974
-
Blue Earth County Welfare Department v. Cabellero
225 N.W.2d 373
Minn. 1974
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 430 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190, 1193 (1930), as follows: “* * * [A]n official so charged with the performance of a *337 ministerial duty will not be allowed to question the constitutionality of such a law.
- Elwell v. County of Hennepin 221 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1974
-
Elwell v. County of Hennepin
221 N.W.2d 538
Minn. 1974
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 430 , in which we said: *69 “* * * The better doctrine supported by the weight of authority is that an official so charged with the performance of a ministerial duty will not be allowed to question the constitutionality of such a law.
- Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
-
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority
151 N.W.2d 584
Minn. 1967
Clinton Falls N. Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190; State ex rel.
- Mower County Board of Commissioners v. Board of Trustees of Public Employees Retirement Ass'n 136 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1965
-
Mower County Board of Commissioners v. Board of Trustees of Public Employees Retirement Ass'n
136 N.W.2d 671
Minn. 1965
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190.
- PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
-
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher
132 N.W.2d 183
Minn. 1964
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 430 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190: “* * * better doctrine supported by the weight of authority is that an official so charged with the performance of a ministerial duty will not be allowed to question the constitutionality of such a law.
- State v. Perry 130 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1964
-
State v. Perry
130 N.W.2d 343
Minn. 1964
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 432 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190.
- Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
-
Lott v. Davidson
109 N.W.2d 336
Minn. 1961
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County *144 of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190; Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 253 Minn. 164 , 91 N. W. (2d) 642 ; Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Comm.
- Bricelyn School District No. 132 v. Board of County Commissioners 55 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1952
-
Bricelyn School District No. 132 v. Board of County Commissioners
55 N.W.2d 602
Minn. 1952
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190, and cases cited.
- Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
-
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth
48 N.W.2d 175
Minn. 1951
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , .
- State v. Meyer 37 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1949
-
State v. Meyer
37 N.W.2d 3
Minn. 1949
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427, 429 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190.
- Lee v. Delmont 36 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1949
-
Lee v. Delmont
36 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 1949
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190; Borchard, Declaratory Judgments (2 ed.) 50, 51; 3 Dunnell, Supp. § 4988a.
- Loew v. Hagerle Brothers 33 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1948
-
Loew v. Hagerle Brothers
33 N.W.2d 598
Minn. 1948
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190; see, 11 Am.
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland 25 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1946
-
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland
25 N.W.2d 474
Minn. 1946
Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of Steele, 181 Minn. 427 , , 71 A. L. R. 1190; Lyman v. Chase, 178 Minn. 244 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.