Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co., 237 N.W. 846.

28 citing documents.

Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980 550 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 1996
Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980 550 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 1996
Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co., 184 Minn. 82, 84-85 , 237 N.W.
Lipka v. MINN. SCHOOL EMPLOY. ASS'N. 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lipka v. MINN. SCHOOL EMPLOY. ASS'N. 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
This test is consistent with the one presented by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co., 184 Minn. 82, 85 , 237 N.W.
Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
This test is consistent with the one presented by the Minnesota Supreme Court in Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co., 184 Minn. 82, 85 , 237 N.W.
Beaudry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1994
Beaudry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1994
This is consistent with the test adopted in Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co., 184 Minn. 82, 85 , 237 N.W.
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1988
Their claim obviously stems from decedent’s death, but it does not “aris[e] out of an injury to the person,” because that phrase in section 573.01 “refers to only two persons, the injured person and the one who perpetrated the injury.” Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co., 184 Minn. 82, 84 , 237 N.W.
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Both Prosser and Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co., 184 Minn. 82 , 237 N.W.
City of St. Paul v. Sorenson 167 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1969
City of St. Paul v. Sorenson 167 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1969
In Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82 , , 78 A. L. R. 589, 9 it was held that a husband’s cause of action for medical expenses and nursing incurred in attempting to cure his wife of the injuries negligently inflicted survives her death and the death of the wrongdoer.
Witthuhn v. Durbahn 157 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1968
Witthuhn v. Durbahn 157 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1968
2 Plaintiff cites the case of Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82 , , 78 A.L.R.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of Isle 122 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1963
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of Isle 122 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1963
2d) 291, 308 , it was stated: “An actionable wrong causing injury to the wife gives rise to two *369 causes of action against the wrongdoer, viz., one in favor of the wife for the damages suffered by her personally, and another in favor of her husband for loss of her services and society and for expenses to which he is put in taking care of her.” Likewise, in Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82, 85 , , 78 A. L. R. 589, this court gave approval to the doctrine that consequential da
Holtz v. Mutual Service Casualty Co. 117 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1962
Holtz v. Mutual Service Casualty Co. 117 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1962
Plaintiff advances as an alternative theory for recovery the provisions of the policy by which defendant assumes liability for property damage, citing Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82 , , 78 A. L. R. 589; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; and Thompson v. Town of Ft.
Fussner v. Andert 113 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1961
Fussner v. Andert 113 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1961
Co. 45 Minn. 330 , , *354 11 L. R. A. 222; Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82 , , 78 A. L. R. 589.
Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82 , , 78 A. L. R. 589, and Annotation.
Kuhnle v. Swedlund 20 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1945
Kuhnle v. Swedlund 20 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1945
Anderson v. Fielding, 92 Minn. 42 , , 104 A. S. R. 665; Keiper v. Anderson, 138 Minn. 392 , , L. R. A. 1918C, 299; Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82 , , 78 A. L. R. 589.
Eklund v. Evans 300 N.W. 617 Minn. 1941
Eklund v. Evans 300 N.W. 617 Minn. 1941
In Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82 , , 78 A. L. R. 589, a husband’s cause of action for medical expenses and nursing in connection with his wife’s injuries negligently inflicted was held to survive the death of the wife and the tortfeasor upon the ground that the cause of action was one not for bodily injury, but for injury to the husband

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by