Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Russell-Miller Milling Co., 235 N.W. 22.

18 citing documents.

Menard, Inc., Relator v. County of Clay 886 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2016
Menard, Inc., Relator v. County of Clay 886 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2016
State v. Russell-Miller Milling Co., 182 Minn. 543, 544, 235 N.W.
Space Center, Inc. v. County of Hennepin 302 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1981
State v. Russell-Miller Milling Co., (In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Waseca County), 182 Minn. 543, 544-45 , 235 N.W.
Real Estate Taxes of Northerly Centre Corp. v. County of Ramsey 248 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1976
cost of construction, cost of reproduction, purpose for which building was used, the intrinsic value or worth of the building, the price at which the owner is willing to sell, the price at which buyers who may use the property for some purpose are willing to buy, the price at which similar property, if any, has sold, and many other things * * V In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Waseca County, 182 Minn. 543, 544 , .” '(Emphasis in original.)
Village of Burnsville v. Commissioner of Taxation 202 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1972
This is so because, as stated in In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Waseca County, 182 Minn. 543, 544 , “[T]he sale value, not the actual value, is what must control.” See, Crossroads *508 Center Inc. v. Commr.
Crossroads Center (Rochester), Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 176 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1970
In In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Waseca County, 182 Minn. 543, 544 , , we said the factors which bear on sale value are: *444 “* * * Location, cost of construction, cost of reproduction, purpose for which building was used, the intrinsic value or worth of the building, the price at which the owner is willing to sell, the price at which buyers who may use the propert
Alstores Realty, Inc. v. State 176 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1970
Alstores Realty, Inc. v. State 176 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1970
Co. 182 Minn. 543 , ; Kalscheuer v. State, 214 Minn. 441 , 8 N. W. (2d) 624 ; In re Taxes of Potlach Timber Co. 160 Minn. 209 , .
Alvin v. Johnson 63 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1954
In re Taxes of Potlach Timber Co. 160 Minn. 209 , ; In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Waseca County, 182 Minn. 543 , .
Schleiff v. County of Freeborn 43 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1950
f construction, cost of reproduction, purpose for which building was used, the intrinsic value or worth of the building, the price at which the owner is willing to,sell, the price at which-buyers who may use the property for some purpose are willing to buy, the price at which similar property, .if *395 any, has sold, and many other things * * *.” In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Waseca County, 182 Minn. 543, 544 , .
Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of Taxation 14 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1944
Paul v. McNiven, 183 Minn. 539 , 237 N. W. *81 410; In re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, 182 Minn. 543 , .
State v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 270 N.W. 609 Minn. 1936
State v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 270 N.W. 609 Minn. 1936
Co. 182 Minn. 543, 544 , ; State ex rel.
State v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance 269 N.W. 37 Minn. 1936
State v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance 269 N.W. 37 Minn. 1936
Such a case was presented in State v. Russell-Miller Milling Co. 182 Minn. 543 , 235 N.W.
State Ex Rel. City of South St. Paul v. McNiven 237 N.W. 410 Minn. 1931
State Ex Rel. City of South St. Paul v. McNiven 237 N.W. 410 Minn. 1931
Co. 182 Minn. 543, 546 , , in which it ivas held that the “sale value” must control.
In Re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Waseca County 235 N.W. 22 Minn. 1931