DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Burgess v. Crafts, 238 N.W. 798.

36 citing documents.

  • Young v. Wlazik 262 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1977
  • Young v. Wlazik 262 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1977
    See, Miller v. Hughes, 259 Minn. 53 , Burdick v. Bongard, 256 Minn. 24 , Rutz v. Iacono, 229 Minn. 591 , Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , 238 N.W.
  • Tanski v. Jackson 130 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1964
  • Tanski v. Jackson 130 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1964
    Rahja v. Current, 264 Minn. 465, 468 , 119 N. W. (2d) 699, 701 ; Rutz v. Iacono, 229 Minn. 591, 595 , 40 N. W. (2d) 892, 895 ; Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384, 386 , .
  • Miller v. Hughes 105 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1960
  • Miller v. Hughes 105 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1960
    Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , ; Kelling v. Howard, 249 Minn. 75 , 81 N. W. (2d) 85 ; Rutz v. Iacono, 229 Minn. 591 , 40 N. W. (2d) 892 .
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
    9 Hanson v. Bailey, 249 Minn. 495 , 83 N. W. (2d) 252 ; Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , .
  • Hanson v. Bailey 83 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1957
  • Hanson v. Bailey 83 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1957
    Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , .
  • Kelling v. Howard 81 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
  • Kelling v. Howard 81 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
    (3 ed.) § 7026a, which states that, where one is riding with an apparently competent driver, “duty requires him to warn the driver of a danger which he has become aware of, and which he has reason to believe the driver has overlooked or is not aware of.” Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , ; Hartel v. Warren, 196 Minn. 465 , ; Wicker v. North States Const. Co. Inc. 183 Minn. 79 , .
  • Wiest v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 52 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1952
  • Wiest v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 52 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1952
    See, McMurray v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 178 Minn. 561 , ; Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , .
  • MacIllravie v. St. Barnabas Hospital 43 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1950
  • MacIllravie v. St. Barnabas Hospital 43 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1950
    Cf. same with Taubert v. Taubert, 103 Minn. 247 , , and Freeman v. Morris Const. Co. 179 Minn. 94 , (involving the singling out and emphasizing of the testimony of a particular witness), and Geddes v. Van Rhee, 126 Minn. 517 , (involving the centering of attention on a detail of a transaction), and Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , (involving contention that quotation from defendant’s answer and the giving of so many of defendant’s requests for instructions threw the charge out of balance).
  • Rutz v. Iacono 40 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1949
  • Rutz v. Iacono 40 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1949
    In Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , 386 , 238 N.W.
  • Robinson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 38 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1949
  • Robinson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 38 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1949
    Cf. Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 884 , ; Engholm v. Northland Transp.
  • Shockman v. Union Transfer Co. 19 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1945
  • Shockman v. Union Transfer Co. 19 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1945
    Co. 173 Minn. 237 , ; Wicker v. North States Const. Co. Inc. 183 Minn. 79, 85 , ; Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , ; Findley v. Brittenham, 199 Minn. 197 , .
  • Boese v. Langley 7 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
  • In Re Estate of Boese 7 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
  • Boese v. Langley 7 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
    urt, after due consideration of the requests of counsel, to charge a jury in an orderly, systematic, and consecutive manner upon the whole law of the case in chief, than to confuse them, as is often done, by giving the special propositions submitted by counsel, which, though perhaps correct, present a partial, disjointed, and therefore often misleading view of the law.” And see Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , ; Sohns v. M. B. Hubbard Grocery Co. 163 Minn. 187 , ; Mac-Leod v. Payne, 149 Minn.
  • In Re Estate of Boese 7 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1942
    And see Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , 238 N.W.
  • McKeown v. Argetsinger 279 N.W. 402 Minn. 1938
  • McKeown v. Argetsinger 279 N.W. 402 Minn. 1938
    Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , ; Cullen v. Pearson, 191 Minn. 136 , , ; Jannette v. M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Co. 193 Minn. 153 , ; 5 Am.
  • Thorstad v. Doyle 273 N.W. 255 Minn. 1937
  • Thorstad v. Doyle 273 N.W. 255 Minn. 1937
    “A guest passenger is of course required to exercise ordinary care for his own safety, but that does not mean he has to assume re *548 sponsibility for the management of the car.” Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384, 386 , .
  • Christensen v. Pestorious 250 N.W. 363 Minn. 1933
  • Christensen v. Pestorious 250 N.W. 363 Minn. 1933
    Co. 128 Minn. 14 , ; Wicker v. North States Const. Co. Inc. 183 Minn. 79 , ; Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , ; 4 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • Hall v. Gillis 246 N.W. 466 Minn. 1933
  • Hall v. Gillis 246 N.W. 466 Minn. 1933
    Compare Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , .
  • Hoffman v. City of St. Paul 245 N.W. 373 Minn. 1932
  • Hoffman v. City of St. Paul 245 N.W. 373 Minn. 1932
    Co. 184 Minn. 349 , ; Burgess v. Crafts, 184 Minn. 384 , .