DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sheffield v. Clifford, 243 N.W. 129.

26 citing documents.

  • Chopp v. Chopp 102 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1960
  • Chopp v. Chopp 102 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1960
    1 Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 ; Martens v. Martens, 211 Minn. 369 , 1 N. W. (2d) 356 ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , 243 N.W.
  • Nelson v. Dorr 58 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1953
  • Nelson v. Dorr 58 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1953
    Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 ; Martens v. Martens, 211 Minn. 369 , 1 N. W. (2d) 356 ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , ; Buro v. Morse, 183 Minn. 518 , ; In re Estate of Malchow, 143 Minn. 53 , .
  • Alsdorf v. Svoboda 57 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1953
  • Alsdorf v. Svoboda 57 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1953
    Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , ; Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Ry.
  • Anderson v. Tuomi 42 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1950
  • Anderson v. Tuomi 42 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1950
    Rogers v. Hedemark, 70 Minn. 441 , ; Louis F. Dow Co. v. Bittner, 185 Minn. 499 , ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , ; Droege v. Brockmeyer, 214 Minn. 182 , 7 N. W. (2d) 538 ; Motzko v. Motzko, 222 Minn. 36 , 22 N. W. (2d) 920 .
  • Perry v. Reuter 38 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1949
  • Kiebach v. Kiebach 35 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1948
  • Kiebach v. Kiebach 35 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1948
    3 Cf. Buro v. Morse, 183 Minn. 518, 521 , ; National Surety Co. v. Wittich, 186 Minn. 93, 95 , ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300, 306 , ; Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Ry.
  • Johnson v. Johnson 27 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1947
  • Johnson v. Johnson 27 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1947
    293 ; Buro v. Morse, 183 Minn. 518 , ; National Surety Co. v. Wittich, 186 Minn. 93 , ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , ; Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees, 187 Minn. 202 , ; Lafayette Club v. Roberts, 196 Minn. 605 , .
  • Droege v. Brockmeyer 7 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1943
  • Droege v. Brockmeyer 7 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1943
    That is but a restatement of a long line of cases cited in Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300, 306 , , where we said: “Where the court refuses to make proposed amendments or changes in the findings, that is equivalent to findings negativing the facts asked to be found.” So, also, in Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees, 187 Minn. 202, 208 , 244 * where we said: “But
  • State v. Riley 7 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1942
  • State v. Riley 7 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1942
    Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , 243 N.W.
  • Blodgett v. Hollo 298 N.W. 249 Minn. 1941
  • Blodgett v. Hollo 298 N.W. 249 Minn. 1941
    Co. 152 Minn. 460, 468 , , 27 A. L. R. 293; Buro v. Morse, 183 Minn. 518 , ; National Surety Co. v. Wittich, 186 Minn. 93 , ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , ; Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Ry.
  • Schaedler v. New York Life Insurance 276 N.W. 235 Minn. 1937
  • Schaedler v. New York Life Insurance 276 N.W. 235 Minn. 1937
    Berg v. Veit, 136 Minn. 443 , ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , .
  • Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co. 272 N.W. 381 Minn. 1937
  • Wyman v. Trustees of Westminster Presbyterian Church 266 N.W. 165 Minn. 1936
  • Wyman v. Trustees of Westminster Presbyterian Church 266 N.W. 165 Minn. 1936
    This court does not review a motion for amended findings, and after a blended motion we consider only the motion for a new trial within the scope of the rule laid down in Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , .
  • Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees 244 N.W. 817 Minn. 1932
  • Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees 244 N.W. 817 Minn. 1932
    Co. 152 Minn. 460 , , 27 A. L. R. 293; National Surety Co. v. Wittich, 186 Minn. 93 , ; Sheffield v. Clifford 186 Minn. 300 , ; 6 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.