DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Osborn v. Will, 236 N.W. 197.

26 citing documents.

  • Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 893 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 893 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    183 Minn. 205 , 236 N.W.
  • Hafner v. Ritzinger 97 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1959
  • Hafner v. Ritzinger 97 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1959
    2 Swanson v. Domning, 251 Minn. 110 , 86 N. W. (2d) 716 ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , .
  • L'Evesque v. Rognrud 93 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1958
  • L'Evesque v. Rognrud 93 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1958
    2 Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , ; Jacobson v. Chicago, M. & St.
  • Swanson v. Domning 86 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1957
  • Swanson v. Domning 86 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1957
    1 See, also, Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , ; Moulton v. Norton, 184 Minn. 343 , ; Gaetke v. The Ebarr Co. Inc. 195 Minn. 393 , ; Spiess v. Brandt, 230 Minn. 246 , 41 N. W. (2d) 561 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 1; Dwinnell v. Oftedahl, 235 Minn. 383 , 51 N. W. (2d) 93 ; Restatement, Restitution, § 28.
  • Jensen v. Dikel 69 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1955
  • Jensen v. Dikel 69 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1955
    ‘If the record discloses evidence, taking the most favorable view of it for the plaintiff, sufficient to sustain a verdict for him, the motion [for a directed verdict] *78 should not be granted.’ Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205, 208 , .” In connection with her appeal from the judgment in favor of Downtown Chevrolet Company, plaintiff contends that the verdict of the jury is not justified by the evidence and that the jury was guilty of misconduct in procuring tools and making experiments in the jur
  • Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co. 61 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1953
  • Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co. 61 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1953
    6 Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , .
  • Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 46 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1951
  • Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 46 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1951
    Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , ; Applequist v. Oliver I. Min.
  • Rosenquist v. Baker 35 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1948
  • Rosenquist v. Baker 35 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1948
    In referring to the Defiel case in Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205, 212 , , this court said: “In Defiel v. Rosenberg, 144 Minn. 166 , , the rule was extended so as to hold that, where the part performance was but a mere trifle of the whole at the time the fraud was discovered, the rule should be the same as if there had been no part performance, and t
  • Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 17 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1944
  • Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 17 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1944
    “If the record discloses evidence, taking the most favorable view of it for the plaintiff, sufficient to sustain a verdict for him, the motion [for a directed verdict] should not be granted.” Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205, 208 , .
  • Forsberg v. Baker 300 N.W. 371 Minn. 1941
  • Forsberg v. Baker 300 N.W. 371 Minn. 1941
    d in support of this contention is Humphrey v. Sievers, 137 Minn. 373, 376 , ; but that case states and cites prior decisions of this court to the effect that where a vendee “has performed the contract, in whole or in part, before discovering the falsity of the representations, he may affirm the contract and bring his action for damages for the deceit.” See also Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , .
  • Goldfine v. Johnson 294 N.W. 459 Minn. 1940
  • Goldfine v. Johnson 294 N.W. 459 Minn. 1940
    National Equipment Corp. v. Volden, 190 Minn. 596 , , rehearing denied, 190 Minn. 601 , ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , ; Cafferty v. Klatt, 147 Minn. 245 , ; Woodward v. Western C. C. Co. 134 Minn. 8 , .
  • Bayerkohler v. Clara City Farmers Elevator Co. 248 N.W. 294 Minn. 1933
  • Bayerkohler v. Clara City Farmers Elevator Co. 248 N.W. 294 Minn. 1933
    Co. 39 Minn. 254 , ; Krenz v. Lee, 104 Minn. 455 , ; Jensen v. Fischer, 134 Minn. 366 , ; Baxter v. Brandenburg, 137 Minn. 259 , ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , .
  • Moulton v. Norton 238 N.W. 686 Minn. 1931
  • Moulton v. Norton 238 N.W. 686 Minn. 1931
    Shane v. Jacobson, 136 Minn. 386 , ; Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321 , ; Tischer v. Bardin, 155 Minn. 361 , ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , .