Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Westberg v. Wilson, 241 N.W. 315.

25 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Estate of: John Stanley LaSha Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Estate of: John Stanley LaSha Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307, 309, 241 N.W.
Sitek v. Striker 764 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Sitek v. Striker 764 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307, 309 , 241 N.W.
Peterson v. Johnson 720 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Peterson v. Johnson 720 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
To determine intent, courts look to “the written memorials of the transaction and the attendant facts and circumstances.” Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307, 309 , 241 N.W.
Fraser v. Fraser 702 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Fraser v. Fraser 702 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“[I]ntention is to be ascertained by the written memorials of the transaction and the attendant facts and circumstances.” Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307, 309 , 241 N.W.
Ministers Life & Casualty Union v. Franklin Park Towers Corp. 239 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1976
Ministers Life & Casualty Union v. Franklin Park Towers Corp. 239 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1976
Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307, 309
Gagne v. Hoban 159 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1968
Gagne v. Hoban 159 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1968
United States v. Minnesota (D. Minn.) 113 F. Supp. 488 ; Citizens Bank of Morris v. Meyer, 149 Minn. 94 , ; Nitkey v. Ward, 199 Minn. 334 , ; Buse v. Page, 32 Minn. 111 , , ; King v. McCarthy, 50 Minn. 222 , ; Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307 , ; Hewitt v. Baker, 222 Minn. 292 , 24 N. W. (2d) 47 ; Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of Wadena, 229 Minn. 263 , 39 N. W. (2d) 164 , affirmed, 338 U. S. 897 , 70 S. Ct. 251 , 94 L. ed. 552; Lundeen v. Nyborg, 161 Minn. 391 , .
Saxton v. Campbell 297 N.W. 348 Minn. 1941
Saxton v. Campbell 297 N.W. 348 Minn. 1941
Nitkey v. Ward 271 N.W. 873 Minn. 1937
Nitkey v. Ward 271 N.W. 873 Minn. 1937
See King v. McCarthy, 50 Minn. 222 , ; Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307 , ; Lun-deen v. Nyborg, 161 Minn. 391 , .
Dod v. Investment Certificate Co. 262 N.W. 683 Minn. 1935
Dod v. Investment Certificate Co. 262 N.W. 683 Minn. 1935
The case is controlled by Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307 , 211 N.W.
Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby & Co. 258 N.W. 824 Minn. 1935
O'Connor v. Schwan 251 N.W. 180 Minn. 1933
O'Connor v. Schwan 251 N.W. 180 Minn. 1933
Bank v. Stanton, 62 Minn. 204 , ; Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307 , ; see Nelson v. Helmbrecht, 155 Minn. 327, 329 , .
McKinley v. State 247 N.W. 389 Minn. 1933
McKinley v. State 247 N.W. 389 Minn. 1933
Among the cases bearing upon such a situation and sustaining the conclusion reached here are Sanderson v. Engel, 182 Minn. 256 , ; Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307 , ; Investors Syndicate v. Horrigan, 186 Minn. 599 , , and cases cited in these three cases.
Investors Syndicate v. Horrigan 244 N.W. 65 Minn. 1932
Investors Syndicate v. Horrigan 244 N.W. 65 Minn. 1932
Sanderson v. Engel, 182 Minn. 256 , ; Westberg v. Wilson, 185 Minn. 307 , ; 4 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.