Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co., 242 N.W. 397.

35 citing documents.

Neomi Schmidt, Minn. 2023
Furthermore, the Workers’ Compensation Act is meant to compensate for loss of earning power, so “injury” in the act “refers to compensable injuries, and these occur when disability appears.”
Issacson v. Minnetonka, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1987
Issacson v. Minnetonka, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1987
Barcel v. Barrel Finish, 304 Minn. 536 , Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co., 186 Minn. 80 , 242 N.W.
Rebiski v. Pioneer Telephone Co. 262 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1978
Rebiski v. Pioneer Telephone Co. 262 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1978
Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co., 186 Minn. 80 , 242 N.W.
Barcel v. Barrel Finish 232 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1975
Barcel v. Barrel Finish 232 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1975
1 Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
See, Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , .
Davidson v. Bermo, Inc. 137 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1965
Davidson v. Bermo, Inc. 137 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1965
In Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , , we held that the statute may, in effect, be tolled if the injury which the.
Beson v. Carleton College 136 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1965
Beson v. Carleton College 136 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1965
Creamery Assn. 248 Minn. 20 , 78 N. W. (2d) 430 ; Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , ; Bruggeman v. Ford Motor Co. 225 Minn. 427 , 30 N. W. (2d) 711 .
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , .
Rosvold v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 102 87 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1958
Rosvold v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 102 87 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1958
In Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80, 84 , , the court said: “The workmen’s compensation act does not contemplate the payment of damages for accidental injuries, no matter how painful.
Potter v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc. 80 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1956
Potter v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc. 80 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1956
Whether the employer herein received the requisite 90-day statutory notice depends on the applicability of the latent- or trivial-injury doctrine of Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , , wherein this court applied the rule that, where an employee in the course of his employment sustains an apparently trivial injury which does not result in present disability and which no person of ordinary prudence, similarly situated, would reasonably anticipate as likely to cause future disability
Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery Association 78 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1956
Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery Association 78 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1956
Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , .
Sobczyk v. City of Duluth 73 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1955
Sobczyk v. City of Duluth 73 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1955
3 This court held in Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , , that “injury” as used in the phrase “occurrence of the injury” had a different meaning than “accident.” It was there held that the act, in referring to the “occurrence of the injury,” meant compensable injuries which occur when disability appears, or when it becomes reasonably apparent that disabilit
Rinne v. W. C. Griffis Co. 47 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1951
Rinne v. W. C. Griffis Co. 47 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1951
In Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , , an employe in the course of his employment struck the knuckle of his right hand with a sledge.
Nelson v. Reid & Wackman 36 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1949
Nelson v. Reid & Wackman 36 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1949
Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , .
Bruggeman v. Ford Motor Co. 30 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1948
Bruggeman v. Ford Motor Co. 30 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1948
Relator contends, however, that the notice received by respondent on September 14, 1945, which was 30 days after the disc operation and approximately 14 months after the accident, constituted notice within the statutory 90-day period under the doctrine of Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , , wherein this court applied the rule that where an employe in the course of his employment sustains an apparently trivial injury which does not result in present disability and which no person of o
Caddy v. R. Maturi & Co. 14 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1944
Caddy v. R. Maturi & Co. 14 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1944
As stated in Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80, 83 , , 398: “* * * There are accidents so' trivial in apparent results at the time that neither the one who might witness the same nor the victim thereof would anticipate disability therefrom, yet the subsequent development thereof may cause not only loss of members but life itself.” While we are not pr
Carmody v. City of St. Paul 291 N.W. 895 Minn. 1940
Carmody v. City of St. Paul 291 N.W. 895 Minn. 1940
In Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , , the employer denied liability for the injury and the employer’s selected physician told the employe to return to the doctor he first consulted.
Pease v. Minnesota Steel Co. 265 N.W. 427 Minn. 1936
Pease v. Minnesota Steel Co. 265 N.W. 427 Minn. 1936
In Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co. 186 Minn. 80 , 242 N.W.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by