DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Romann v. Bender, 252 N.W. 80.

36 citing documents.

  • Carpenter v. Nelson 101 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1960
  • Carpenter v. Nelson 101 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1960
    Similarly, the following instruction in Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419, 424 , , was upheld: “* * * If you find that he is permanently disabled, from the evidence in court to a reasonable certainty by a fair preponderance of the evidence, you would have a right to award him permanent damages; * * (Italics supplied.)
  • Carmody v. Aho 86 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1957
  • Carmody v. Aho 86 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1957
    In Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419, 424 , , in considering a matter of this kind, we said: “* * * What will happen when two cars meet head-on or at an angle, one or both going from 30 to 40 miles per hour just before meeting, is beyond safe prediction; and especially it is so when their drivers are consciously or involuntarily seeking
  • Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
  • Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
  • Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
    Co. 106 Minn. 77 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co. 175 Minn. 150 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , .
  • Carpenter Ex Rel. Carpenter v. Birkholm 65 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1954
  • Carpenter Ex Rel. Carpenter v. Birkholm 65 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1954
    2 Tri-State Transfer Co. v. Nowotny, 198 Minn. 537 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , .
  • Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
  • Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
    Co. 106 Minn. 77 , ; Carson v. Turrish, 140 Minn. 445 , , L. R. A. 1918F, 154; Gau v. J. Borgerding & Co. 175 Minn. 150 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , .
  • Price v. Mackner 58 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1953
  • Maher v. Roisner 57 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1953
  • Maher v. Roisner 57 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1953
    See, Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , ; Hammel v. Feigh, 143 Minn. 115 , .
  • Price v. Mackner 58 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1953
    Bauer v. Miller Motor Co. 197 Minn. 352 , ; see, Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , , citing Larsen v. N. P. Ry.
  • Aasen v. Aasen 36 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1949
  • Aasen v. Aasen 36 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1949
    See, Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419, 424 , .
  • Gordon v. Pappas 34 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1948
  • Moose v. Vesey 29 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1947
  • Melzer v. Snow 29 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1947
  • Moose v. Vesey 29 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1947
    See, Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , .
  • Melzer v. Snow 29 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1947
    In Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419, 424 , , it is stated: “* * * The most that can be said for the physical facts is that they were of aid to the jury in reaching a result favorable to the plaintiff or favorable to the defendant but not conclusive of how the accident happened.
  • Beckman v. Schroeder 28 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1947
  • Beckman v. Schroeder 28 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1947
    that were made, and the marks made by the Schroeder car plowing forward, that the Schroeder car must have been traveling at a much greater speed than the Hertsgaarde car, and the reason for that is that the Hertsgaarde car was stopped almost in its tracks, whereas the Schroeder car continued on through the air, landing in the snow, and plowing forward.” ' In Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 119 , 121, , this court said: «* * * yypat will happen when two cars meet head-on or at an angle, one or both g
  • Wilcox v. Schloner 23 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1946
  • Wilcox v. Schloner 23 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1946
    It follows that the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante.” See, also, Callahan v. City of Duluth, 197 Minn. 403 , ; Gendler v. S. S. Kresge Co. 195 Minn. 578 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , ; Timmins v. Pfeifer, 180 Minn. 1 , .
  • Johnson v. Whitney 14 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1944
  • Johnson v. Whitney 14 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1944
    1927, § 9495); Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , ; Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479, 483 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372, 375 .
  • Reiter v. Porter 13 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1944
  • Reiter v. Porter 13 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1944
    It is true, as stated in Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419, 424 , , that “the law attaches to them [physical facts] no certain conclusion”; that “surprising results” sometimes occur from a collision; and that “after a collision the markings on the cars and on the road and the location of the cars are not sure proof of just how the accident happened, though th
  • Gates v. Herberger 279 N.W. 711 Minn. 1938
  • Gates v. Herberger 279 N.W. 711 Minn. 1938
    Co. 198 Minn. 79 , ; State v. Winberg, 196 Minn. 135 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , ; Donaldson v. Carstensen, 188 Minn. 443 , ; Steinbauer v. Stone, 85 Minn. 274 , .
  • State v. Sprague 276 N.W. 744 Minn. 1937
  • State v. Sprague 276 N.W. 744 Minn. 1937
    Co. 198 Minn. 79 , *419 ; State v. Winberg, 196 Minn. 135 , ; Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , ; Donaldson v. Carstensen, 188 Minn. 443 , ; Steinbauer v. Stone, 85 Minn. 274 , .
  • Lacheck v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 273 N.W. 366 Minn. 1937
  • Lacheck v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 273 N.W. 366 Minn. 1937
    As stated in the opinion of Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419, 424 , , 82: “The most that can be said for the physical facts is that they were of aid to the jury in reaching a result favorable to the plaintiff or favorable to the defendant but not conclusive of how the accident happened.