Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peet v. the Roth Hotel Co., 253 N.W. 546.
-
Amanda M. Doub, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
9 state.’” Peet v. Roth Hotel Co., 191 Minn. 151, 156, 253 N.W.
- Production Credit Ass'n of St. Cloud v. Fitzpatrick 385 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Production Credit Ass'n of St. Cloud v. Fitzpatrick
385 N.W.2d 410
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Peet v. The Roth Hotel Co., 191 Minn. 151, 155 , 253 N.W.
- Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance v. Hansord Pontiac Co. 136 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1965
-
Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance v. Hansord Pontiac Co.
136 N.W.2d 381
Minn. 1965
2 Harding v. Shapiro, 165 Minn. 248 , ; Peet v. The Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151, 156 , ; Dennis v. Coleman’s Parking & Greasing Stations, 211 Minn. 597, 601 , 2 N. W. (2d) 33, 35 ; Murphy v. Co-op Laundry Co. 230 Minn. 213 , 41 N. W. (2d) 261 ; Central Mutual Ins.
- Wallinga v. Johnson 131 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1964
-
Wallinga v. Johnson
131 N.W.2d 216
Minn. 1964
We agree with plaintiff that Peet v. The Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151 , , controls.
- Holt v. Swenson 90 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1958
-
Holt v. Swenson
90 N.W.2d 724
Minn. 1958
10 See, Everson v. De Schepper, 157 Minn. 257 , ; Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151 , ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
- Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. Whetstone 81 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1957
-
Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. Whetstone
81 N.W.2d 849
Minn. 1957
As we said in Peet v. Both Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151, 157 , , 549: “Because the care required was that of the ordinary person in the same or similar circumstances, it is but obvious that, whatever *338 defendant’s care of its own property may have been, it would not alter the standard of care applicable to plaintiff’s property in its hands as bailee.
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co. 79 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1956
-
Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.
79 N.W.2d 142
Minn. 1956
2 Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151 , ; Restatement, Contracts, § 475.
- Knaus Truck Lines, Inc. v. Donaldson 51 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1952
-
Knaus Truck Lines, Inc. v. Donaldson
51 N.W.2d 99
Minn. 1952
Dybvig v. Minneapolis Sanatorium, 128 Minn. 292, 294 , ; In re Estate of Havenmaier, 163 Minn. 218, 220 , ; Zieve v. Holstad Coffee Co. 198 Minn. 580 , ; see, Town of Balkan v. Village of Buhl, 158 Minn. 271 , , 35 A. L. R. 470; cf. McArdle v. Williams, 193 Minn. 433 , ; Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151 , .
- Murphy v. Co-operative Laundry Co. of St. Paul, Inc. 41 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1950
-
Murphy v. Co-operative Laundry Co. of St. Paul, Inc.
41 N.W.2d 261
Minn. 1950
Stine v. Hines, 148 Minn. 132 , ; West v. First State Bank, 158 Minn. 342 , ; Harding v. Shapiro, 165 Minn. 248 , ; White v. Sullivan, 174 Minn. 549 , ; Solberg v. Minneapolis Willys-Knight Co. 177 Minn. 10 , ; Cargill Grain Co. v. Cleveland-Cliffs S. S. Co. 182 Minn. 516 , ; Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151 , ; Dennis v. Coleman’s P. & G. Stations, Inc. 211 Minn. 597 , 2 N. W. (2d) 33 ; Zanker v. *215 Cedar Flying Service, Inc. 214 Minn. 242 , 7 N. W. (2d) 775 .
- State v. Bolsinger 21 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1946
-
State v. Bolsinger
21 N.W.2d 480
Minn. 1946
Notwithstanding the rule in civil cases that degrees of negligence are not recognized in this state (see, Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151 , ; Lauritsen v. American Bridge Co. 87 Minn. 518 , ), it is our plain duty to recognize and give effect to degrees of negligence where a statute adopts them as a basis for fixing criminal responsibility.
- Zanker v. Cedar Flying Service, Inc. 7 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1943
-
Zanker v. Cedar Flying Service, Inc.
7 N.W.2d 775
Minn. 1943
Co. 122 Minn. 453, 456 , ; Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151, 156 , ; Hoel v. Flour City F. & T. Co. 144 Minn. 280 , .
- Dennis v. Coleman's Parking & Greasing Stations, Inc. 2 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1942
-
Dennis v. Coleman's Parking & Greasing Stations, Inc.
2 N.W.2d 33
Minn. 1942
& Supp. § 728, and cases under note 96; Goddard, Outlines of Law of Bailments & Carriers (2 ed.) § 2, p. 2; Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151 , .
- Gustafson v. Arthur L. Roberts Hotel Co. 261 N.W. 447 Minn. 1935
-
Gustafson v. Arthur L. Roberts Hotel Co.
261 N.W. 447
Minn. 1935
Peet v. Roth Hotel Co. 191 Minn. 151 , ; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.