Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sherman v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance, 255 N.W. 113.
- Minn. 2021
- Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
-
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc.
133 N.W.2d 484
Minn. 1965
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; Bauer v. Miller Motor Co. 197 Minn. 352 , ; Hiber v. City of St.
- Trimbo v. Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co. 110 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1961
-
Trimbo v. Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co.
110 N.W.2d 168
Minn. 1961
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; Hagsten v. Simberg, 232 Minn. 160 , 44 N. W. (2d) 611 ; Meyers v. Minneapolis, St.
- Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
-
Jensen v. Linner
108 N.W.2d 705
Minn. 1961
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , , in the Hagsten case this court reaffirmed the following rales ( 232 Minn. 164 , 44 N. W. [2d] 613): “* * * Reasonable minds functioning judicially must be able to conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted by the verdict outweighs and preponderates over any other theory; but, a
- Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
-
Erickson v. Strickler
90 N.W.2d 232
Minn. 1958
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
- Knuth v. Murphy 54 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1952
-
Knuth v. Murphy
54 N.W.2d 771
Minn. 1952
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , ; Hagsten v. Simberg, 232 Minn. 160 , 44 N. W. (2d) 611 ; Standafer v. First Nat.
- Standafer v. First National Bank 52 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1952
- Standafer v. First National Bank 52 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1952
- Hagsten v. Simberg 44 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1950
-
Hagsten v. Simberg
44 N.W.2d 611
Minn. 1950
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , , we discussed the degree of proof required to establish a fact in a civil action by circumstantial evidence.
- State v. Hitchcock 37 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1949
- State v. Hitchcock 37 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1949
- Hafften v. Kirsch 36 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1949
-
Hafften v. Kirsch
36 N.W.2d 35
Minn. 1949
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , .
- Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
-
Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co.
18 N.W.2d 121
Minn. 1945
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; 23 Minn. L. Rev. 78 ; Schoewe v. Winona P. & G. Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , ; Smith v. Mason Bros. Co. 174 Minn. 94 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Tomhave v. Galena
- Dege v. Produce Exchange Bank 2 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1942
-
Dege v. Produce Exchange Bank
2 N.W.2d 423
Minn. 1942
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , .
- Smock v. Mankato Elks Club 280 N.W. 851 Minn. 1938
-
Smock v. Mankato Elks Club
280 N.W. 851
Minn. 1938
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , 255 N. W. *267 113; Nealis v. C. R. I. & P. Ry.
- Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 279 N.W. 257 Minn. 1938
- Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 279 N.W. 257 Minn. 1938
- Scheele v. Union Loan & Finance Co. 274 N.W. 673 Minn. 1937
-
Scheele v. Union Loan & Finance Co.
274 N.W. 673
Minn. 1937
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , , that “it is sufficient if reasonable minds may conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted by the verdict outweighs and preponderates over any other.” As stated, the treatment received by plaintiff from defendant Erickson was wrongful from start to finish.
- Cutler v. the Modern Samaritans 255 N.W. 824 Minn. 1934
-
Cutler v. the Modern Samaritans
255 N.W. 824
Minn. 1934
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , , but in this case the complaint pleads only the presumption from seven years’ absence and does not allege death except as a result of the presumption.