DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fitchette v. Taylor, 254 N.W. 910.

24 citing documents.

  • Matter of Discipline of Jorissen 391 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1986
  • Matter of Discipline of Jorissen 391 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1986
    See Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582, 584 , 254 N.W.
  • Sharood v. Hatfield 210 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1973
  • Sharood v. Hatfield 210 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1973
    Thus, in Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , we upheld our right to prohibit by injunction those not members of the bar from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Olson 206 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1973
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Olson 206 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1973
    In Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582, 584 , , 94 A. L. R. 356, 358 (1934), we said: “* * * Ordinarily, injunction does not lie merely to prevent commission of crime.
  • State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 92 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1958
  • State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 92 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1958
    (3 ed.) § 4483a; 9 Miller v. Minneapolis Underwriters Assn. Inc. 226 Minn. 367 , 33 N. W. (2d) 48 ; Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , , 94 A. L. R. 356.
  • Gardner v. Conway 48 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1951
  • Gardner v. Conway 48 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1951
    Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , , 94 A. L. R. 356; Cowern v. Nelson, 207 Minn. 642 , ; see, Miller v. Minneapolis Underwriters Assn. Inc. 226 Minn. 367, 371 , 33 N. W. (2d) 48, 51 ; M. S. A. 481.02.
  • Miller v. Minneapolis Underwriters Assn. Inc. 33 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1948
  • Miller v. Minneapolis Underwriters Assn. Inc. 33 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1948
    2 State v. Sportsmen’s Country, Club, 214 Minn. 151 , 7 N. W. (2d) 495 ; State v. Preuss, 217 Minn. 100 , 13 N. W. (2d) 774 ; Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , , 94 A. L. R. 356; Town of Linden v. Fischer, 154 Minn. 354 , ; Campbell v. Motion Picture M. O. Union, 151 Minn. 220 , ; State v. Vaughan, 81 Ark.
  • Calich v. Consul of the Kingdom 8 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
  • Calich v. Consul of the Kingdom 8 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
    Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , , 94 A. L. R. 356; In re Disbarment of Otterness, 181 Minn. 254 , , 73 A. L. R. 1319; Trovatten v. Minea, 213 Minn. 544 , 7 N. W. (2d) 390 .
  • Trovatten v. Minea 7 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1942
  • Trovatten v. Minea 7 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1942
    Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , , 94 A. L. R. 356; In re Otterness, 181 Minn. 254 , , 73 A. L. R. 1319.
  • Conway v. State Consolidated Publishing Co. 112 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1941
  • Thorn v. George A. Hormel & Co. 289 N.W. 516 Minn. 1940
  • Cowern v. Nelson 290 N.W. 795 Minn. 1940
  • Cowern v. Nelson 290 N.W. 795 Minn. 1940
    He accepts without reservations the holding of this court in Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , , 94 A. L. R. 356, and concedes that the regulation of the practice of law is peculiarly within the control of the judicial branch of the government whether that regulation be of those admitted to the bar or for the purpose of protection to the public against unauthorized attempts to practice law by la
  • Thorn v. George A. Hormel & Co. 289 N.W. 516 Minn. 1940
    Kaufer v. Ford, 100 Minn. 49 , ; Fairley v. City of Duluth, 150 Minn. 374 , , 32 A. L. R. 1258; Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , , 94 A. L. R. 356, are cited by plaintiffs as authorizing a class suit in the instant case.
  • Klotz v. Jeddeloh 276 N.W. 244 Minn. 1937
  • Klotz v. Jeddeloh 276 N.W. 244 Minn. 1937
    See In re Otterness, 181 *359 Minn. 254, , 73 A. L. R. 1319; Fitchette v. Taylor, 191 Minn. 582 , , 94 A. L. R. 356.
  • Funk Jewelry Co. v. State Ex Rel. La Prade 50 P.2d 945 Ariz. 1935