Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co., 245 N.W. 31.

26 citing documents.

Seekins v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 103 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1960
Seekins v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 103 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1960
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , ; Ausen v. Minneapolis, St.
Standafer v. First National Bank 52 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1952
Standafer v. First National Bank 52 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1952
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , ; 38 Am.
Blaske v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 37 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1949
Blaske v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 37 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1949
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , ; Hollister v. Hines, 150 Minn. 185 , ; Massmann v. G. N. Ry.
Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1944
Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1944
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , , are not in point, because neither one of them involved liability for violation of the statute, in question.
Rhine v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 297 N.W. 852 Minn. 1941
Rhine v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 297 N.W. 852 Minn. 1941
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , ; Olson v. C. G. W. R. Co. 193 Minn. 533 , ; Sullivan v. Boone, 205 Minn. 437 , 286 N. W. *284 350; Krause v. C. St.
Krause v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 290 N.W. 294 Minn. 1940
Krause v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 290 N.W. 294 Minn. 1940
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , , it was held that this statute was not designed for the protection of motor vehicle passengers who run into a train lawfully occupying a grade crossing.
Krtinich v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 287 N.W. 870 Minn. 1939
Krtinich v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 287 N.W. 870 Minn. 1939
Co. 187 Minn. 263, 266 , .
Sullivan v. Boone 286 N.W. 350 Minn. 1939
Sullivan v. Boone 286 N.W. 350 Minn. 1939
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , ; Ausen v. M. St.
Massmann v. Great Northern Railway Co. 282 N.W. 815 Minn. 1938
Massmann v. Great Northern Railway Co. 282 N.W. 815 Minn. 1938
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , , or in Ausen v. M. St.
Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 278 N.W. 41 Minn. 1938
Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad 278 N.W. 41 Minn. 1938
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , ; Pokora v. Wabash Ry.
Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 276 N.W. 813 Minn. 1937
Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 276 N.W. 813 Minn. 1937
Olson v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 259 N.W. 70 Minn. 1935
Olson v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 259 N.W. 70 Minn. 1935
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , , cases from other jurisdictions were carefully reviewed.
Ausen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 258 N.W. 511 Minn. 1935
Ausen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 258 N.W. 511 Minn. 1935
Co. 187 Minn. 263 , , when applied to the evidence herein, control and, we think, sustain the court below in directing a verdict for defendants.