Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite First National Bank v. Flynn, 250 N.W. 806.

48 citing documents.

Christensen v. Eggen 562 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Christensen v. Eggen 562 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
First Nat’l Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 106-07 , 250 N.W.
Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of Minnesota 518 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1994
Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of Minnesota 518 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1994
Therefore, “a party should not be bound by an election unless he has pursued the chosen course to a determinative conclusion or has procured advantage therefrom, or has thereby subjected his adversary to injury.” First Nat’l Bank of Osakis v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 107 , 250 N.W.
City of St. Paul ex rel. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. St. Anthony Flats Ltd. Partnership 517 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
City of St. Paul ex rel. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. St. Anthony Flats Ltd. Partnership 517 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
First Nat’l Bank of Osakis v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 106 , 250 N.W.
Rudnitski v. Seely 452 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1990
Rudnitski v. Seely 452 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1990
First Nat’l Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 106-07 , 250 N.W.
Covington v. Pritchett 428 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Covington v. Pritchett 428 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
First National Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 106-07 , 250 N.W.
Kohler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 416 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kohler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 416 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
First National Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102,107 , 250 N.W.
Kosbau v. Dress 400 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kosbau v. Dress 400 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
First National Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 106-07 , 250 N.W.
American Federation of State, Employees Local 66 & Council 96 v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners 281 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1979
American Federation of State, Employees Local 66 & Council 96 v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners 281 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1979
See, First National Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , 250 N.W.
Northwestern State Bank, Osseo v. Foss 197 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1972
Northwestern State Bank, Osseo v. Foss 197 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1972
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , it is true that if inconsistent remedies are sought and it is doubtful which one will bring relief, a party may claim either or both alternatively until one affords a remedy and the claimant is not bound by his election until one remedy is pursued to a determinative conclusion.
Blackduck State Bank v. Wickham 158 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1968
Blackduck State Bank v. Wickham 158 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1968
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A.L.R.
State v. J. P. Sinna & Sons, Inc. 136 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1965
State v. J. P. Sinna & Sons, Inc. 136 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1965
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272; see, Thoen v. First Nat.
Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. Handler 83 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1957
Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. Handler 83 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1957
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272, this court in Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Osterberg, supra, clarified the law on the subject, rejecting the theory of an election of remedies and overruling Holmes v. Sehnedler, supra.
Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin 65 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1954
Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin 65 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1954
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 107 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272: “* * * it is a safe premise that a party should not be bound by an election unless he has pursued the chosen course to a determinative conclusion or has procured advantage therefrom or has thereby subjected his adversary to injury.” 4 , (Italics supplied.)
Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of Wadena 39 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1949
Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of Wadena 39 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1949
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272; Ash Creek State Bank v. Zwart, 158 Minn. 100 , ; Scofield v. National Elev.
Cashen v. Owens 29 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1947
Cashen v. Owens 29 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1947
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 106 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272, we said: “The purpose of the doctrine of election of remedies is not to prevent recourse to any remedy but to prevent double redress for a single wrong.” We deemed the issue there presented to be closely analogous to “the settled rule of real estate mortgage law that the r
LeBorius v. Reynolds 23 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1946
In Re Estate of Leborius 23 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1946
In Re Estate of Leborius 23 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1946
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , 107 , 250 N.W.
LeBorius v. Reynolds 23 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1946
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102, 107 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272, the court said: “The doctrine, of election, of Roman origin (1 Pomeroy, Equity [3 ed.] § 463), is in our law but an application of the equitable maxim that he who seeks equity must do equity (id.
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Ozmun 14 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1944
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Ozmun 14 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1944
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272; 2 Dunnell, Dig.
Rickel v. Peck 2 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1942
In Re Guardianship of Overpeck 2 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1942
In Re Guardianship of Overpeck 2 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1942
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , 250 N.W.
Rickel v. Peck 2 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1942
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272.
Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co. 287 N.W. 15 Minn. 1939
Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co. 287 N.W. 15 Minn. 1939
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272, and 34 C. J. p. 981.
Mantz v. Sullwold 281 N.W. 764 Minn. 1938
Mantz v. Sullwold 281 N.W. 764 Minn. 1938
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272.
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Osterberg 275 N.W. 681 Minn. 1937
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Osterberg 275 N.W. 681 Minn. 1937
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , , 92 A. L. R. 1272.
Donaldson v. Mona Motor Oil Co. 251 N.W. 272 Minn. 1933
Donaldson v. Mona Motor Oil Co. 251 N.W. 272 Minn. 1933
Bank v. Flynn, 190 Minn. 102 , .