Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sherman v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance, 255 N.W. 113.

31 citing documents.

Minn. 2021
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; Bauer v. Miller Motor Co. 197 Minn. 352 , ; Hiber v. City of St.
Trimbo v. Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co. 110 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1961
Trimbo v. Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co. 110 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1961
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; Hagsten v. Simberg, 232 Minn. 160 , 44 N. W. (2d) 611 ; Meyers v. Minneapolis, St.
Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , , in the Hagsten case this court reaffirmed the following rales ( 232 Minn. 164 , 44 N. W. [2d] 613): “* * * Reasonable minds functioning judicially must be able to conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted by the verdict outweighs and preponderates over any other theory; but, a
Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
Knuth v. Murphy 54 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1952
Knuth v. Murphy 54 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1952
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , ; Hagsten v. Simberg, 232 Minn. 160 , 44 N. W. (2d) 611 ; Standafer v. First Nat.
Standafer v. First National Bank 52 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1952
Standafer v. First National Bank 52 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1952
Hagsten v. Simberg 44 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1950
Hagsten v. Simberg 44 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1950
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , , we discussed the degree of proof required to establish a fact in a civil action by circumstantial evidence.
State v. Hitchcock 37 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1949
State v. Hitchcock 37 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1949
Hafften v. Kirsch 36 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1949
Hafften v. Kirsch 36 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1949
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , .
Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; 23 Minn. L. Rev. 78 ; Schoewe v. Winona P. & G. Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , ; Smith v. Mason Bros. Co. 174 Minn. 94 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Tomhave v. Galena
Dege v. Produce Exchange Bank 2 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1942
Dege v. Produce Exchange Bank 2 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1942
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , .
Smock v. Mankato Elks Club 280 N.W. 851 Minn. 1938
Smock v. Mankato Elks Club 280 N.W. 851 Minn. 1938
Co. 191 Minn. 607, 612 , 255 N. W. *267 113; Nealis v. C. R. I. & P. Ry.
Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 279 N.W. 257 Minn. 1938
Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 279 N.W. 257 Minn. 1938
Scheele v. Union Loan & Finance Co. 274 N.W. 673 Minn. 1937
Scheele v. Union Loan & Finance Co. 274 N.W. 673 Minn. 1937
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , , that “it is sufficient if reasonable minds may conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted by the verdict outweighs and preponderates over any other.” As stated, the treatment received by plaintiff from defendant Erickson was wrongful from start to finish.
Cutler v. the Modern Samaritans 255 N.W. 824 Minn. 1934
Cutler v. the Modern Samaritans 255 N.W. 824 Minn. 1934
Co. 191 Minn. 607 , , but in this case the complaint pleads only the presumption from seven years’ absence and does not allege death except as a result of the presumption.