Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 254 N.W. 443.

26 citing documents.

Westling v. County of Mille Lacs 581 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1998
Westling v. County of Mille Lacs 581 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1998
Apartment Operators’ Ass’n v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365, 369 , 254 N.W.
Ruberto v. County of Washington 572 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1997
Ruberto v. County of Washington 572 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1997
Apartment Operators’ Ass’n v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365, 366 , 254 N.W.
Lund v. County of Hennepin 403 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1987
Lund v. County of Hennepin 403 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1987
In Apartment Operators Ass’n v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , 254 N.W.
Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk 222 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1974
Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk 222 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1974
Reed v. Bjornson, 191 Minn. 254, 261 , Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365, 366 , In re Taxes on Property of Cold Spring Granite Co. 271 Minn. 460, 466
Elwell v. County of Hennepin 221 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1974
Elwell v. County of Hennepin 221 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1974
In Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , wherein we upheld the constitutionality of a lower assessed valuation on a specified portion of the actual value of real estate used for homestead purposes, we stated ( 191 Minn. 368 , ): “That use is a proper basis for qualification cannot now well be questioned.
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Marketing Assn. v. Huggins, 162 Minn. 471 , ; Dimke v. Finke, 209 Minn. 29 , ; Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , .
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Raymond v. Holm, 165 Minn. 215 , ; Reed v. Bjornson, 191 Minn. 254 , ; Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , .
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 12 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1943
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 12 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1943
Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , ; Black v. State, 113 Wis.
C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. Spaeth 297 N.W. 9 Minn. 1941
C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. Spaeth 297 N.W. 9 Minn. 1941
Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. Lee (D. C.) 11 F. Supp. 672 (separate taxes on chain stores, a graduated tax according to number of stores and a gross income tax, the latter being held unconstitutional on other grounds); Gibson County v. Pullman So.
Dimke v. Finke 295 N.W. 75 Minn. 1940
Dimke v. Finke 295 N.W. 75 Minn. 1940
Co. v. County of Martin, 104 Minn. 179 , ; Reed v. Bjornson, 191 Minn. 254 , ; Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , .
State Ex Rel. Remick v. Clousing 285 N.W. 711 Minn. 1939
State Ex Rel. Remick v. Clousing 285 N.W. 711 Minn. 1939
See Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minne *303 apolis, 191 Minn. 365 , ; State v. Helmer, 169 Minn. 221 , .
510 Groveland Avenue, Inc. v. Erickson 276 N.W. 287 Minn. 1937
510 Groveland Avenue, Inc. v. Erickson 276 N.W. 287 Minn. 1937
See also Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , , maintaining the statute now in question (L. 1933, c. 359) against challenge on the ground that, in its favoring treatment of homesteads, it violated the requirement of uniformity.
Logan v. Young 254 N.W. 446 Minn. 1934
Logan v. Young 254 N.W. 446 Minn. 1934
This is a companion case to Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of Minneapolis, 191 Minn. 365 , , and the objections made to L. 1933, c. 359, therein disposed of will not here be considered.