Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Honer v. Nicholson, 268 N.W. 852.

32 citing documents.

Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
Fitch v. FARMERS UNION G. TERM. ASS'N (AMBER MILL. D.) 143 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1966
Causal Relationship Recognizing the principle that a finding of causation cannot be based on mere conjecture, Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , ; Hiber v. City of St.
Roman v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 129 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1964
Roman v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 129 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1964
Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , .
Weber v. Printing, Inc. 116 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1962
Zappa v. Charles Manufacturing Co. 109 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1961
Zappa v. Charles Manufacturing Co. 109 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1961
4 Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , ; O’Connor v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. 197 Minn. 534 , .
Danielson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 98 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1959
Danielson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 98 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1959
2 Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55, 59 , ; Sporna v. Kalina, 184 Minn. 89, 91 , , 76 A. L. R. 1280; Peerless Hosiery Co. v. Northern Ins.
Dornberg v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
Dornberg v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
See, Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , .
Koktavy v. City of New Prague 75 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1956
Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , ; O’Connor v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. 197 Minn. 534 , .” *441 The distinction is between inference and conjecture.
Dix v. Harris Machinery Co. 60 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
Dix v. Harris Machinery Co. 60 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 ; Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , ; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 59 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1953
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 59 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1953
500 , 157 A. 523 ; Honer v. Nicholson; 198 Minn. 55, 59 , ; Annotation, 135 A. L. R. 516.
Albert Lea Ice & Fuel Co. v. United States Fire Insurance 58 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1953
Albert Lea Ice & Fuel Co. v. United States Fire Insurance 58 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1953
Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , .
Hagsten v. Simberg 44 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1950
Hagsten v. Simberg 44 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1950
As we said in Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55, 59 , , 854: “* * * On its face it is but conjecture, and affirmative decisions cannot stand on such unsupported speculation even though it is a professional emanation.” The facts in this case are not too dissimiliar from those in O’Neil v. Cochrane, 184 Minn. 354 , , except that in that ca
Smith v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 36 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1949
Smith v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 36 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1949
h in subjecting life, liberty, and property to the mere speculative opinions of men claiming to be experts, and we are not disposed to extend the rule into the field of mere hypothetical conjecture, which, in a case like the present, must necessarily have been so uncertain and unreliable as to be *22 purely conjectural, and utterly unsafe for either court or jury to adopt.” In Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55, 59 , , we said concerning medical testimony: “* * * On its face it is but conjecture,
Hiber v. City of St. Paul 16 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1944
Hiber v. City of St. Paul 16 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1944
Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , ; O’Connor v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. 197 Minn. 534 , .
Susnik v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 286 N.W. 249 Minn. 1939
Susnik v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 286 N.W. 249 Minn. 1939
Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , .
Nyberg v. Little Falls Black Granite Co. 277 N.W. 536 Minn. 1938
Nyberg v. Little Falls Black Granite Co. 277 N.W. 536 Minn. 1938
In Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , , cited by relator, the decision is summarized in the opinion as follows ( 198 Minn. 59 ) : “The whole point is that here, under established law, the medical testimony cannot properly be given the effect of creating a fact issue.
Fredrickson v. Arrowhead Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n 277 N.W. 345 Minn. 1938
Fredrickson v. Arrowhead Co-Operative Creamery Ass'n 277 N.W. 345 Minn. 1938
Anderson v. Anderson, 188 Minn. 602 , ; Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , .