Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance, 269 N.W. 37.

28 citing documents.

Alstores Realty, Inc. v. State 176 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1970
Alstores Realty, Inc. v. State 176 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1970
Co. 198 Minn. 115, 120 , , expresses the view that— “* * * income is a large factor in arriving at sales value of property; it is not the sole criterion.” And, Minnesota v. Federal Reserve Bank (D. Minn.) 25 F. Supp. 14, 19 , notes that while— “* * * capitalization of income will fairly reflect taxable values, * * * th
Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 117 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1962
Red Owl Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 117 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1962
State v. Wagner 46 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1951
State v. Wagner 46 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1951
Co. 198 Minn. 115 , ; Kalscheuer v. State, 214 Minn. 441 , 8 N. W. (2d) 624 .
Schleiff v. County of Freeborn 43 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1950
Schleiff v. County of Freeborn 43 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1950
Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 37 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1949
Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 37 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1949
See, also, State v. First Bank Stock Corp. 197 Minn. 544 , , ; The Canisteo Corp. v. Spaeth, 211 Minn. 185 ,, ; Cargill, Inc. v. Spaeth, 215 Minn. 540 , 10 N. W. (2d) 728 .
Marshall-Wells Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 20 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1945
Marshall-Wells Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 20 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1945
*468 In State v. First Bank Stock Corp. 197 Minn. 544, 551, 556 , 526 , , this court pointed out: “The established local business situs of defendant’s bank stocks and their unitary use here in a new integer of business and property furnish all the basis needed to support the challenged tax, for which we hold defendant liable.
Cargill, Inc. v. Spaeth 10 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1943
Cargill, Inc. v. Spaeth 10 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1943
Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. Beeler, 315 U. S. 649 , 62 S. Ct. 857 , 86 L. ed. 1090; First Bank Stock Corp. v. Minnesota, 301 U. S. 234 , 57 S. Ct. 677 , 81 L. ed. 1061, 113 A. L. R. 228 (affirming 197 Minn. 544 , , ); Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U. S. 193 , 56 S. Ct. 773 , 80 L. ed. 1143.
Kalscheuer v. State 8 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1943
Kalscheuer v. State 8 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1943
Irvine v. Spaeth 299 N.W. 204 Minn. 1941
Irvine v. Spaeth 299 N.W. 204 Minn. 1941
The nature of its business, local and otherwise, is fully stated in State v. First Bank Stock Corp. 197 Minn. 544 , , , affirmed, 301 U. S. 234 , 57 S. Ct. 677 , 81 L. ed. 1061, 113 A. L. R. 228.
State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co. 284 N.W. 294 Minn. 1939
State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co. 284 N.W. 294 Minn. 1939
Holmes v. Borgen 273 N.W. 623 Minn. 1937
Holmes v. Borgen 273 N.W. 623 Minn. 1937
Bag Co. v. Wallace, 197 Minn. 216 , ; State v. First Bank Stock Corp. 197 Minn. 544 , , .
State v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company 272 N.W. 547 Minn. 1937
State v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company 272 N.W. 547 Minn. 1937
State v. First Bank Stock Corporation 270 N.W. 574 Minn. 1936
State v. First Bank Stock Corporation 270 N.W. 574 Minn. 1936
The questions presented are those decided by this court on the former appeal in the same cause taken by the state from an order denying the state’s motion for amended findings and conclusions or for a new trial, as reported in 197 Minn. 544 , , .
State v. First Bank Stock Corp. 267 N.W. 519 Minn. 1936
State v. First Bank Stock Corp. 267 N.W. 519 Minn. 1936

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by