30,972.
Precedential
Processed
Oien v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
Cited by
- Roaderick v. Lull Engineering Company, Inc. 208 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 1973
- Putnam v. Gordon Jensen, Inc. 139 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1965
- Winter Wolff & Co. v. Co-Op Lead & Chemical Co. 111 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1961
- Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'n 17 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1945
- Northern Drug Co. v. Abbett 284 N.W. 881 Minn. 1939
- Rye v. Phillips 282 N.W. 459 Minn. 1938
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Addison Miller, Inc. v. American Central Insurance 249 N.W. 795
- Dwyer v. Illinois Oil Co. 252 N.W. 837
- Dormady v. Hose 246 N.W. 521
- Jordan v. Great Northern Railway Co. 83 N.W. 391
Opinion text
Stone, Justice (concurring in the result). Exhibit C was not an offer. It was a mere invitation to negotiate. Plaintiff’s application (exhibit A) was the offer, which when accepted by defendant made the whole contract. That is enough to compel decision for defendant. Hence I prefer not to express any opinion on defendant’s plea of accord and satisfaction.