Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Taylor v. More, 263 N.W. 537.

29 citing documents.

Michael Fosness, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Timothy Michaels, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Eng’g Sales, Inc., () , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Ola Abdelaziz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Said another way, “[t]he rule forbids to add by parol when the writing is silent, as well as to vary where it speaks.” (quotation omitted).
LHB Properties, LLC v. E. Y. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
LHB Properties, LLC v. E. Y. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We also construe contracts “in the light of surrounding circumstances and the purpose for which it was executed.” Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448, 453, 263 N.W.
Poser v. Abel 510 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Poser v. Abel 510 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448, 452 , 263 N.W.
McNeill & Associates, Inc. v. ITT Life Insurance Corp. 446 N.W.2d 181 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
McNeill & Associates, Inc. v. ITT Life Insurance Corp. 446 N.W.2d 181 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448, 454-55 , 263 N.W.
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448, 453 , 263 N.W.
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
As we indicated in Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448 , 263 N.W.
Westendorf v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. 435 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Westendorf v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. 435 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448, 454-55 , 263 N.W.
United Artists Communications, Inc. v. Corporate Property Investors 410 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
United Artists Communications, Inc. v. Corporate Property Investors 410 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448, 454-55 , 263 N.W.
Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc. 200 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1972
Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc. 200 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1972
As we indicated in Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448 , if the alleged oral agreement is one that parties similarly situated would embody in the written agreement, then the written document is “complete.” 2 Reading the written agreement dated May 30, 1964, in light of all the attendant circumstances, including the situation of the parties and the su
McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n 104 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1960
McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n 104 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1960
Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448 , ; see, also, 9 Wigmore, Evidence (3 ed.) § 2430.
Jimmerson v. Troy Seed Co. 53 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1952
Jimmerson v. Troy Seed Co. 53 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1952
The additional contractual terms sought to be established here by extrinsic parol evidence are not of such a nature as would be left to a collateral oral agreement as in Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448 , .
Augustin v. Ziemer 22 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1946
Augustin v. Ziemer 22 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1946
In Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448, 451 , , this court said: “It is true that the ordinary receipt, which is nothing more than a written admission and not contractual in character, may be varied or supplemented by oral evidence; * * Order affirmed.
Peterson v. Barnsdall Oil Co. 273 N.W. 260 Minn. 1937
Peterson v. Barnsdall Oil Co. 273 N.W. 260 Minn. 1937
The incompetent testimony must have been admitted over objection to bring the case within the rule laid down in Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448 , , in which the rule for varying the terms of a written instrument by parol are discussed.
State Ex Rel. Canam Metals, Ltd. v. Department of Commerce 264 N.W. 789 Minn. 1936
State Ex Rel. Canam Metals, Ltd. v. Department of Commerce 264 N.W. 789 Minn. 1936
Thompson v. Libby, 34 Minn. 374 , ; Mitchill v. Lath, 247 N. Y. 377 , 160 N. E. 646 , 68 A. L. R. 239; Osterberg v. Section 30 Development Co. 160 Minn. 497 , ; Taylor v. More, 195 Minn. 448 , .