DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ferraro v. Taylor, 265 N.W. 829.

41 citing documents.

  • Jacob Becker, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    1937) ( concerning a closing argument by plaintiff’s counsel that was “permeated with the contention that there was somethi ng reprehensible on defendant ’s part about the taking of [certain] statements from the plaintiff,” despite the fact that there was nothing in the record showing that the taking of the statements was fraudulent or done in a reprehensible manner); -33 (Minn. 1936) (granting a new trial because counsel “made statements of fact not justified by the record”).
  • Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc. 149 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1967
  • Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc. 149 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1967
    Co. 185 Minn. 167 , ; Campbell v. Sargent, 186 Minn. 293 , ; Swanson v. Swanson, 196 Minn. 298 , ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , ; Krenik v. Westerman, 201 Minn. 255 , ; Anderson v. Hawthorn Fuel Co. 201 Minn. 580 , ; Rian v. Hegnauer, 210 Minn. 607 , ; Rom v. Calhoun, 227 Minn. 143 , 34 N. W. (2d) 359 ; Magistad v. Potter, 227 Minn. 570 , 36 N. W. (2d) 400 ; Strand v. G. N. Ry.
  • Schwartz v. Wenger 124 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
  • Schwartz v. Wenger 124 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
    9 Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5, 12 , ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597, 603 , ; In re Estate of Cunningham, 219 Minn. 80, 85 , 17 N. W. (2d) 85, 88 ; State v. Garden, 267 Minn. 97 , 125 N. W. (2d) 591 .
  • Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
  • Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
    3 In Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5, 7 , , this court said that: “* * * The rule seems to be well established that if the occurrence of the intervening cause might reasonably have been anticipated, such intervening cause will not interrupt the connection between the original cause and the injury.” In Pattock v. St.
  • Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
  • Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
    The case of Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , , involving the impropriety of counsel testifying as a witness, is clearly not in point.
  • Maher v. Roisner 57 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1953
  • Maher v. Roisner 57 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1953
    Magistad v. Potter, 227 Minn. 570 , 36 N. W. (2d) 400 ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , ; Brown v. Burrow, 171 Minn. 219 , ; C. & N. W. Ry.
  • Crawford v. Woodrich Construction Co. Inc. 57 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1953
  • Crawford v. Woodrich Construction Co. Inc. 57 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1953
    6 Eichten v. Central Minnesota C. P. Assn. 224 Minn. 180 , 28 N. W. (2d) 862 ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , .
  • Kothe v. Tysdale 46 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1951
  • Kothe v. Tysdale 46 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1951
    As to a lessor’s liability, see Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , ; Saunders System Birmingham Co. v. Adams, 217 Ala.
  • State v. Schaub 44 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1950
  • State v. Schaub 44 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1950
    “* * * Even if the accident could not have happened but for the negligence of Barrows, if his act ought reasonably to have been anticipated and guarded against, the act of spilling the gasoline could be found to have caused the accident although the precise manner in which it occurred could not have been foreseen.” See, Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , .
  • Hagerty v. Radle 37 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1949
  • Hagerty v. Radle 37 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1949
    Peoples State Bank v. Drake-Ballard Co. 164 Minn. 175 , ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , .
  • Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n 28 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1947
  • Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n 28 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1947
    As stated in Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5, 7 , , 831: “* * * The rule seems to be well established that if the occurrence of the intervening cause might reasonably have been anticipated, such intervening cause will not interrupt the connection between the original cause and the injury.” In Holmberg v. Villaume, 158 Minn. 442, 445
  • Murphy v. Dyson 25 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1946
  • Murphy v. Dyson 25 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1946
    See, Griffiths v. Wolfram, 22 Minn. 185 ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , 265 * Johnson v. Land O’Lakes Motor Co. 218 Minn. 404 , 16 N. W. (2d) 466 ; Walker v. Stecher, 219 Minn. 152 , 17 N. W. (2d) 317 ; Johnson v. Evanski, 221 Minn. 323 , 22 N. W. (2d) 213 .
  • Pogue v. Fegan 17 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1944
  • In Re Estate of Cunningham 17 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1944
  • Pogue v. Fegan 17 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1944
    Peoples State Bank v. Drake-Ballard Co. 164 Minn. 175, 184 , ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , , supra.
  • In Re Estate of Cunningham 17 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1944
    59 , 62 ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , 265 N.W.
  • Arnold v. Northern States Power Co. 297 N.W. 182 Minn. 1941
  • Arnold v. Northern States Power Co. 297 N.W. 182 Minn. 1941
    Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , , illustrates the rule here applicable.
  • In Re Estate of Stephens 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
  • Cole v. Healy 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
  • In Re Estate of Stephens 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
    In Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , 12 , 265 N.W.
  • Cole v. Healy 293 N.W. 90 Minn. 1940
    In Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5, 12 , , we said: “The practice of attorneys of furnishing from their own lips and on their own oaths the controlling testimony for their client, is one not to be condoned by judicial silence.
  • Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co. 289 N.W. 563 Minn. 1939
  • Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co. 289 N.W. 563 Minn. 1939
    But in the ordinary situation there is no more reason to relieve the builder of a latent trap than to absolve a defendant in such a situation as was involved in Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , .
  • Butler v. Northwestern Hospital 278 N.W. 37 Minn. 1938
  • Butler v. Northwestern Hospital 278 N.W. 37 Minn. 1938
    To the same effect is Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , .
  • Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 275 N.W. 408 Minn. 1937
  • Distinguished Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 275 N.W. 408 Minn. 1937
    Counsel relies upon Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , , and Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , .
  • Prescott v. Swanson 267 N.W. 251 Minn. 1936
  • Prescott v. Swanson 267 N.W. 251 Minn. 1936
    What we recently said in Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5, 11 , -833 , fits into the present situation: “Courts are here to administer justice, not to award verdicts according to prejudice, and it is the duty of the trial court to see that lawyers do not arouse the passions or the prejudices of jurors.