DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Prescott v. Swanson, 267 N.W. 251.

37 citing documents.

  • Lesewski v. Nielsen 95 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1959
  • Hondl v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 82 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1957
  • Hondl v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 82 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1957
    In Schmitt v. Emery, 215 Minn. 288, 292 , 9 N. W. (2d) 777, 780 , we construed this statute as one “not for the exclusive benefit of the surviving spouse and next of kin, but for the exclusive benefit, first, of those having demands for funeral expenses and for the support *315 of the decedent as preferred beneficiaries, and, second, for the surviving spouse and next of kin.” Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ; Sykora v. Case Threshing-Mach.
  • Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 77 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1956
  • Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
  • Distinguished Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
    In this respect, the case is clearly distinguishable from such decisions as Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, supra; Lee v. Osmundson, 206 Minn. 487 , ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , , where insurance coverage was repeatedly emphasized and featured in the questioning of witnesses or in the closing argument of counsel.
  • Ostrowski v. Mockridge 65 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1954
  • Ostrowski v. Mockridge 65 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1954
    42, 345 , 1 N. W. (2d) 137, 139 , it was stated: “* * * So long as the insurance is not featured or made the basis at the trial for an appeal to increase or decrease the damages, the information would seem to be without prejudice.” In the cases relied upon by defendant (Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. [2d] 582; Lee v. Osmundson, 206 Minn. 487 , ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ; Brown v. Murphy Transfer & Storage Co. 190 Minn. 81 , ), the existence of liability insuran
  • Maher v. Roisner 57 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1953
  • Maher v. Roisner 57 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1953
    Magistad v. Potter, 227 Minn. 570 , 36 N. W. (2d) 400 ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , ; Brown v. Burrow, 171 Minn. 219 , ; C. & N. W. Ry.
  • Olson v. Olson 55 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1952
  • Olson v. Olson 55 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1952
    In Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325, 331 , , where, there was evidence that the defendant was blinded when a gust of steam from a locomotive swept across the highway and that he had crowded slightly over the center line, this court impliedly approved the following instruction with reference to excuse for violation of § 169.18: “* *.
  • Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
  • Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
    & Supp. §§ 3575, 3593e), or where there is a recovery for her wrongful death by asserting a claim therefor against the fund recovered (Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ).
  • Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull 18 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1945
  • Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull 18 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1945
    Lee v. Osmundson, 206 Minn. 487 , ; see, also, Brown v. Murphy T. & S. Co. 190 Minn. 81 , ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ; Swanson v. Swanson, 196 Minn. 298 , .
  • Schmitt v. Emery 9 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1943
  • Schmitt v. Emery 9 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1943
    Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , .
  • Weber v. McCarthy 7 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1943
  • In Re Estate of Kirschstein 4 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1942
  • Coleman v. Kirschstein 213 Minn. 1 Minn. 1942
  • Bergstrom v. Frank 4 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1942
  • In Re Estate of Kirschstein 4 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1942
    286 ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , 267 N.W.
  • Coleman v. Kirschstein 213 Minn. 1 Minn. 1942
    Paul Trust Co. 46 Minn. 526 , ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , .
  • Bergstrom v. Frank 4 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1942
    Defendant cites and relies on the late cases of Nahan v. Stevenson, 182 Minn. 269 , , and Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , , where prior decisions are considered.
  • Johnson v. Reinhard Brothers Co. Inc. 285 N.W. 536 Minn. 1939
  • Johnson v. Reinhard Brothers Co. Inc. 285 N.W. 536 Minn. 1939
    Salera v. Schroeder, 183 Minn. 478 , ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ; Keane v. Butner, 150 Minn. 90 , ; Lahiff v. McAloon, 152 Minn. 517 , .
  • Santee v. Haggart Construction Co. 278 N.W. 520 Minn. 1938
  • Santee v. Haggart Construction Co. 278 N.W. 520 Minn. 1938
    See Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325, 338 , .
  • Anderson v. Hawthorn Fuel Co. 277 N.W. 259 Minn. 1938
  • Anderson v. Hawthorn Fuel Co. 277 N.W. 259 Minn. 1938
    Co. 133 Minn. 192 , ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ; Krenik v. Westerman, 201 Minn. 255 , ; 5 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • Krenik v. Westerman 275 N.W. 849 Minn. 1937
  • Krenik v. Westerman 275 N.W. 849 Minn. 1937
    We need not repeat what was said in Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , , or in Swanson v. Swanson, 196 Minn. 298 , .
  • Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 275 N.W. 408 Minn. 1937
  • Distinguished Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 275 N.W. 408 Minn. 1937
    Counsel relies upon Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , , and Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , .
  • Tri-State Transfer Co. v. Nowotny 270 N.W. 684 Minn. 1936
  • Tri-State Transfer Co. v. Nowotny 270 N.W. 684 Minn. 1936
    Brown v. Murphy T. & S. Co. 190 Minn. 81 , , and Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , , cited by plaintiff, involved different situations.