DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate of Jordan, 271 N.W. 104.

26 citing documents.

  • Severson v. Engbarth 135 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1965
  • Severson v. Engbarth 135 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1965
    In re Estate of Jordan, 1937, 199 Minn. 53 , .
  • Hafner v. Hafner 54 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1952
  • Hafner v. Hafner 54 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1952
    505; Cahaley v. Cahaley, 216 Minn. 175 , 12 N. W. (2d) 182 ,157 A. L. R. 1; Bloomquist v. Thomas, 215 Minn. 35 , 9 N. W. (2d) 337 ; Berg v. Berg, 227 Minn. 173 , 34 N. W. (2d) 722 ; In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , .
  • In Re Trust Created by Will of Enger 30 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1948
  • Leraan v. Aftenro Society 30 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1948
  • Leraan v. Aftenro Society 30 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1948
    In the Laun case, which is *240 probably the leading one, the court held that failure to disclose self-dealing constituted extrinsic fraud within the rule of United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 61 , 25 L. ed. 93, which we followed in In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , , and said ( 155 Wis.
  • In Re Trust Created by Will of Enger 30 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1948
    In the Laun case, which is *Page 240 probably the leading one, the court held that failure to disclose self-dealing constituted extrinsic fraud within the rule of United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 , 25 L. ed. 93 , which we followed in In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , 271 N.W.
  • Bloomquist v. Thomas 9 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
  • Bloomquist v. Thomas 9 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
    Hass v. Billings, 42 Minn. 63 , 43 N. W 797; McElrath v. McElrath, 120 Minn. 380 , ; Murray v. Calkins, 191 Minn. 460 , ; In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , ; United States v. Throckmorton, 98 *39 U. S. 61, 25 L. ed. 93.
  • Peters v. Walling 3 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1942
  • In Re Estate of Gooch 3 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1942
  • In Re Estate of Gooch 3 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1942
    In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , 58 , 271 N.W.
  • Peters v. Walling 3 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1942
    we have held in many cases that the authority thus granted “is as great as the power possessed and exercised by the district court in like or similar matters”; and that, “like the district court,” *275 it is “authorized by our constitution and the common law to correct at any time clerical errors, to clarify ambiguities, and make its judgments read as they were intended.” In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53, 58 , ; In re Estate of Henry, 207 Minn. 609, 612 , ; In re Estate of Daniel, 208 Minn.
  • Lenhart v. Lenhart Wagon Co. 298 N.W. 37 Minn. 1941
  • Lenhart v. Lenhart Wagon Co. 298 N.W. 37 Minn. 1941
    f a claim against a prostrate corporation, already satisfied and largely barred by limitations; in pursuance of a conspiracy to defraud adverse interests, was an “act or omission * * * that prevented defendant from acquiring notice of the action, from interposing a defense, and litigating the case on the merits.” Clark v. Marvin, 140 Minn. 285, 288 , , 1030; In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53, 60 , ; In re Estate of Woodworth, 207 Minn. 563, 568 , .
  • Geo. Benz & Sons v. Hassie 293 N.W. 133 Minn. 1940
  • Geo. Benz & Sons v. Hassie 293 N.W. 133 Minn. 1940
    In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , ; Oswald v. Minneapolis Times Co. 65 Minn. 249 , ; 3 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • Henry v. Ringey 292 N.W. 249 Minn. 1940
  • In Re Estate of Henry 292 N.W. 249 Minn. 1940
  • In Re Estate of Henry 292 N.W. 249 Minn. 1940
    31 ; In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , 271 N.W.
  • Henry v. Ringey 292 N.W. 249 Minn. 1940
    1 ; Larson v. How, 71 Minn. 250 , ; Savela v. Erickson, 138 Minn. 93 , ; In re Estate of Eklund, 174 Minn. 28 , ; In re Estate of Koffel, 175 Minn. 524 , ; In re Estate of Holum, 179 Minn. 315 , ; In re Estate of Walker, 183 Minn. 325 , ; In re Estate of Simon, 187 Minn. 399 , ; In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , .
  • In Re Estate of Flora Woodworth 292 N.W. 192 Minn. 1940
  • In Re Estate of Flora Woodworth 292 N.W. 192 Minn. 1940
    It is enough to refer to In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , , and our prior cases there cited on p. 60.
  • Shave v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 272 N.W. 597 Minn. 1937
  • Shave v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 272 N.W. 597 Minn. 1937
    Appellant in the oral argument cited Sellars v. Sellars, 196 Minn. 143 , ; In re Estate of Jordan, 199 Minn. 53 , .