Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 275 N.W. 694.

48 citing documents.

Old Republic Surety Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A breach- of-contract claim “accrues immediately on a breach, though actual damages resulting therefrom do not occur until afterwards.” (quotation omitted).
Minn. 2019
See Calder v. City of Crystal , (“ ‘When a right is dependent on a contingency, the cause of action accrues and the statute begins to run on the date of the happening of the contingency.’ ” ()); Bachertz v. Hayes -Lucas Lumber Co. , (“Of course, when a right depends upon some condition or contingency, the cause of action accrues and the statute runs upon the fulfilment of the condition or the happening of the contingency.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)).7 U.S. Bank, howev
Isanti Pines Tree Farm, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co., see also Bachertz v. Hayes -Lucas Lumber Co. , 201 Minn. 171, 176, (“[A] cause of action for breach of contract accrues immediately on a breach, t hough actual damages resulting therefrom do not occur until afterwards.” (quotation omitted)).
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
788 (1944) (concluding that a statute of limitation defense is *560 based on the proposition that if one person has a claim against another it would be inequitable for that person to assert such claim after an unreasonable lapse of time); Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group 877 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 2016
Weavewood, Inc. v. S & P Home Investments, LLC 821 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
Weavewood, Inc. v. S & P Home Investments, LLC 821 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
Similarly, in Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Company, we observed that a statute of limitations “commences to run against a cause of action from the time it accrues — in other words, from the time an action thereon can be commenced.” 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann 808 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 2011
Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann 808 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 2011
Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Antone v. Mirviss 720 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 2006
Entzion v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 675 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Entzion v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 675 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Jacobson v. Board of Trustees 627 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Jacobson v. Board of Trustees 627 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Rockford Township v. City of Rockford 608 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rockford Township v. City of Rockford 608 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Zagaros v. Erickson 558 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Zagaros v. Erickson 558 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., (citing Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Estate of Riedel Ex Rel. Mirick v. Life Care Retirement Communities, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Estate of Riedel Ex Rel. Mirick v. Life Care Retirement Communities, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co. 441 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1989
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co. 441 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1989
Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Marriage of Froats v. Froats 415 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Froats v. Froats 415 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Grothe v. Shaffer, 305 Minn. 17 , (citing Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171 , 275 N.W.
O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 381 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1986
O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 381 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1986
E.g., Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Karels v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Karels v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
§ 541.05 (1984) The general purpose of this statute is to “prescribe a period within which a right may be enforced, afterwards withholding a remedy for reasons of private justice and public policy ...” Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Bartlett v. Miller & Schroeder Municipal, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bartlett v. Miller & Schroeder Municipal, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Calder v. City of Crystal 318 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1982
Calder v. City of Crystal 318 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1982
Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171 , 275 N.W.
Leisure Dynamics, Inc. v. Falstaff Brewing Corp. 298 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1980
Leisure Dynamics, Inc. v. Falstaff Brewing Corp. 298 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1980
Butler v. Minneapolis Police Relief Association, 283 Minn. 70 , Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171 , 275 N.W.
Contos v. Herbst 278 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 1979
Contos v. Herbst 278 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 1979
The purpose of a statute of limitations is to “prescribe a period within which a right may be enforced, afterwards withholding a remedy for reasons of private justice and public policy.” Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co., 201 Minn. 171, 176 , 275 N.W.
Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. Shaffer 232 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1975
Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. Shaffer 232 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1975
Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co. 201 Minn. 171
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co. 158 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1968
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co. 158 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1968
Wolff v. Rhude & Fryberger, Inc. 145 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1966
Wolff v. Rhude & Fryberger, Inc. 145 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 1966
Co. 201 Minn. 171 , ; 11 Dunnell, Dig.
Wichelman v. Messner 83 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1957
Wichelman v. Messner 83 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1957
Ekdahl v. Minnesota Utilities Co. 281 N.W. 517 Minn. 1938

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by