DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc., 275 N.W. 416.

31 citing documents.

  • Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    More than 80 years ago, the supreme court determined that “[i]t is clear that the purpose [of the Act] was to make the owner of motor vehicles liable to those injured by their operation upon public streets or highways where no such liability would otherwise exist.”
  • Leppla v. American Family Insurance Group 238 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1976
  • Leppla v. American Family Insurance Group 238 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1976
    Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394, 409 , Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44
  • Hutchings v. Bourdages 189 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
  • Hutchings v. Bourdages 189 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
    3 As we said in Holmes v. Lilygren *214 Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44, 48 , , and reiterated in Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
  • MacIoch v. Wagner 134 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1965
  • MacIoch v. Wagner 134 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1965
    Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 202 Minn. 615 , ; Bolton-Swanby Co. v. Owens, 201 Minn. 162 , ; Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44 , ; Carey v. Broadway Motors, Inc. 253 Minn. 333 , 91 N. W. (2d) 753 ; Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co. 253 Minn. 199 , 91 N. W. (2d) 585 ; Stroesser v. Hopper, 269 Minn. 96 , 129 N. W. (2d) 913 .
  • Carey v. Broadway Motors, Inc. 91 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1958
  • Carey v. Broadway Motors, Inc. 91 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1958
    In Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 202 Minn. 615 , ; Bolton-Swanby Co. v. Owens, 201 Minn. 162 , ; and Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44 , , this court established the rule that registration of an automobile under M. S. A. 168.15 1 establishes prima facie that the registrant is the owner of the automobile described in such registration, but evidence may be submitted to the effect that actual ownership may be in a person or a *336 corporat
  • Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co. 91 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1958
  • Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co. 91 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1958
    Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44 , .
  • Frye v. Anderson 80 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1957
  • Frye v. Anderson 80 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1957
    Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44 , ; Bolton-Swanby Co. v. Owens, 201 Minn. 162 , , 22 Minn. L. Rev. 720 ; Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 202 Minn. 615 , .
  • Lawin v. Pepe 43 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1950
  • Lawin v. Pepe 43 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1950
    Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44 , ; Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 202 Minn. 615 , .
  • Jacobsen v. Dailey 36 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1949
  • Jacobsen v. Dailey 36 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1949
    The court there cited Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44, 48 , , where we said: *205 “* * * It is clear that the purpose [0/ the statute in question] was to make the owner of motor vehicles liable to those injured by their operation upon public streets or highways where no such liability would otherwise exist.” (Italics supplied.)
  • Truman v. United Products Corporation 14 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1944
  • Truman v. United Products Corporation 14 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1944
    Ballman v. Brinker, 211 Minn. 322 , 1 N. W. (2d) 365 ; Schultz v. Swift & Co. 210 Minn. 533 , ; Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn, 44, ; Ewer v. Coppe, 199 Minn. 78 , .
  • Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc. 10 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1943
  • Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc. 10 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1943
    As said in Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44, 48 , , 418: “It is clear that the purpose [of the statute in question] was to malee the owner of motor vehicles liable to those injured by their operation upon public streets or highways where no such liability would otherwise exist.” (Italics supplied.)
  • Krinke v. Timm 1 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1942
  • Krinke v. Timm 1 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1942
    “More may be considered than the naked title to the motor vehicle in determining who is the owner.” Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44, 48 , .
  • Klingman v. Loew's Incorporated 296 N.W. 528 Minn. 1941
  • Klingman v. Loew's Incorporated 296 N.W. 528 Minn. 1941
    Johnson v. Evans, 141 Minn. 356, 360, 361 , ; Farnham v. Pepper, 193 Minn. 222, 226, 227 , ; Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44, 47 , .
  • Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 279 N.W. 582 Minn. 1938
  • Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 279 N.W. 582 Minn. 1938
    1936 Supp. § 2672, which reads: “Any person, firm, association or corporation owning or renting a motor vehicle, or having the exclusive use thereof, under a lease or otherwise, for a period of greater than 30 days.” Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44 , .
  • Koski v. Muccilli 277 N.W. 229 Minn. 1938
  • Koski v. Muccilli 277 N.W. 229 Minn. 1938
    Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44 , .
  • Bolton-Swanby Co. v. Owens 275 N.W. 855 Minn. 1937
  • Bolton-Swanby Co. v. Owens 275 N.W. 855 Minn. 1937
    The purposes of the act are taxation and identification of automobiles, having no regard to vendees of the person holding the registered title, Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc. 201 Minn. 44 , ; Amick v. Exchange State Bank, 164 Minn. 136 , ; 5 Am.