Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 277 N.W. 899.

34 citing documents.

State v. M.B.M. 518 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. MBM 518 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. M.B.M. 518 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
§ 645.17(4) (1992) (when court of last resort has construed language of law, legislature intends same construction in subsequent legislation); In re Trusteeship under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187, 198 , (reenactment of statute after construction by courts is adoption of the construction).
State v. MBM 518 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
§ 645.17(4) (1992) (when court of last resort has construed language of law, legislature intends same construction in subsequent legislation); In re Trusteeship under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187, 198 , (reenactment of statute after construction by courts is adoption of the construction).
In re the Trust of Brown 380 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re the Trust of Brown 380 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“ ‘[I]n construing the will the important thing is to ascertain the intention *914 of the testator.’ ” In Re Trusts Under Will of McCann, 212 Minn. 233, 240 , quoting In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187, 189
Agassiz & Odessa Mutual Fire Insurance v. Magnusson 136 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1965
Agassiz & Odessa Mutual Fire Insurance v. Magnusson 136 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1965
In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , ; Young v. Blandin, 215 Minn. 111 , 9 N. W. (2d) 313 .
In Re Trusteeship Under Agreement With Mayo 259 Minn. 91 Minn. 1960
In Re Trusteeship Under Agreement With Mayo 259 Minn. 91 Minn. 1960
Thus, in In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187, 189 , , it was held that trustees were not authorized to invest trust assets in corporate stock because of the absence of specific directions to do so and because of the trust provision that the trustees "shall invest and reinvest all principal cash in the trust fund in first mortgages on improved real estate, in munic
Allen v. Holm 66 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1954
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth 44 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1950
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth 44 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1950
7 Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn. 208 Minn. 263 , ; In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , ; Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , .
Stevens v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 32 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1948
Stevens v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 32 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1948
*162 Ir re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , .
Rowell v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 22 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1946
In Re Trust Under Will of Jones 22 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1946
Rowell v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 22 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1946
In that case, In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. *526 187 , , this court, in an opinion by Mr. Justice Peterson affirming the order of the lower court, held that corporate stocks were impliedly excluded from the classes of investments authorized to be made by the trustee under the will and that the trustee had no authority to invest funds of the trust in corporate stocks.
In Re Trust Under Will of Jones 22 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1946
In that case, In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , *Page 526 , this court, in an opinion by Mr. Justice Peterson affirming the order of the lower court, held that corporate stocks were impliedly excluded from the classes of investments authorized to be made by the trustee under the will and that the trustee had no authority to invest funds of the trust in corporate stocks.
In Re Trust Under Will of Schultz 9 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
Northwestern National Bank & Trust Co. v. Pirich 9 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
Northwestern National Bank & Trust Co. v. Pirich 9 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
The rules have been considered in such recent cases as In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , ; In re Trusts Under Will of McCann, 212 Minn. 233 , 3 N. W. (2d) 226 ; In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , ; In re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , ; Radintz v. N. W. Nat.
In Re Trust Under Will of Schultz 9 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
The rules have been considered in such recent cases as In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , ; In re Trusts Under Will of McCann, 212 Minn. 233 , ; In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , 300 N.W.
Pritchard v. Carpenter 3 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1942
In Re Trusts Under Will of McCann 3 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1942
In Re Trusts Under Will of McCann 3 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1942
In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , 189 , , 901 ; In re Trust of Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , 91 , 300 N.W.
Pritchard v. Carpenter 3 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1942
All provisions should be harmonized and given meaning if possible.” In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187, 189 , ; In re Trust of Watland, 211 Minn. 84, 91 , .
Butler v. Builders Trust Co. 282 N.W. 462 Minn. 1938
Butler v. Builders Trust Co. 282 N.W. 462 Minn. 1938
See In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , .
State Ex Rel. Ervin v. Crookston Trust Co. 282 N.W. 138 Minn. 1938
Relator frankly concedes that notwithstanding the restricted or limited grant of powers to trust companies, this rule of law, expressed and fortified with many cited authorities in Jones v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 202 Minn. 187, 194 , , should be applied to them: “The controlling principle is that a corporation has only the powers and capacities expressly granted to it by law, or incidental to its existence or necessary to the exercise of its express powers.” Since the power of receiving tru
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Van Derlip 277 N.W. 909 Minn. 1938
Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. First National Bank & Trust Co. 277 N.W. 909 Minn. 1938
Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. First National Bank & Trust Co. 277 N.W. 909 Minn. 1938
In In re Trusteeship under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , , we held that under 2 Mason Minn. St.
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Van Derlip 277 N.W. 909 Minn. 1938
In In re Trusteeship under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , , we held that under 2 Mason Minn. St.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by