DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc., 279 N.W. 257.

35 citing documents.

  • Minn. 2021
    ”); Paine v. Gambl e Stores, Inc., –61 (Minn. 1938) (upholding jury verdict on proximate cause based on the theory—supported solely by circumstantial evidence —that a faulty handrail caused decedent to fall down a stair way); Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co. , 144 N.W.
  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
    5 Paine v. Gamble *163 Stores, Inc., 202 Minn. 462 , and that a jury-may draw reasonable inferences in a malpractice case to establish causation.
  • McCormack v. Hankscraft Company 154 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1967
  • McCormack v. Hankscraft Company 154 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1967
    Bank, 243 Minn. 442 , 68 N. W. (2d) 362 ; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; Lindroth v. Walgreen Co. 329 Ill.
  • Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
  • Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
    4 See, Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; Standafer v. First Nat.
  • Hanson v. Christensen 145 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1966
  • Hanson v. Christensen 145 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1966
    Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; Nicol v. Geitler, 188 Minn. 69 , ; Emery v. Minneapolis Industrial Exposition, 56 Minn. 460 , .
  • Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
  • Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
    Co. supra; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; Kundiger v. Prudential Ins.
  • Majerus v. Guelsow 113 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1962
  • Majerus v. Guelsow 113 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1962
    Co. 219 Minn. 381, 388 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121, 124 , “it is not necessary that the evidence in support of the inference adopted [by the fact-finder] must outweigh other reasonable inferences so as to demonstrate their impossibility.” In Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407, defendant was shown to be negligent in maintaining a stairway with a defective handrail, and decedent was found in an areaway at the foot of the stairway, but there was no direct proof that the conditi
  • Lindgren v. Voge 109 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1961
  • Lindgren v. Voge 109 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1961
    Nicol v. Geitler, supra; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407.
  • Hill v. Gaertner 92 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1958
  • Hill v. Gaertner 92 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1958
    7 Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn, 462, , 116 A. L. R. 407; Rose v. Mooers Brothers Inc. 161 Minn. 149 , ; Williams v. Dickson, 122 Minn. 49 , ; Widing v. Penn Mutual Life Ins.
  • Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
  • Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
    Co. 191 Minn. 607 , ; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc. 89 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1958
  • Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc. 89 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1958
    2 See, for instance, Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407, where substantially the same claims were made.
  • Westling v. Holm 58 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1953
  • Westling v. Holm 58 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1953
    Co. supra; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. supra.
  • Lamb v. South Unit Jehovah's Witnesses 45 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1950
  • Lamb v. South Unit Jehovah's Witnesses 45 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1950
    671 ; Johnson v. Elmborg, 165 Minn. 67 , ; Moore v. Townsend, 76 Minn. 64 , , supra; McCarrier v. Hollister, 15 S. D. 366, ; Gainfort v. 229 Raritan Avenue Corp. 127 N. J. L. 409, 22 A. (2d) 893; cf. Shepstedt v. Hayes, 221 Minn. 74 , 21 N. W. (2d) 199 ; Kooreny v. Dampier-Baird Mortuary, Inc. 207 Minn. 367 , 291 * Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407.
  • Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
  • Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co. 18 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1945
    aher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 172 Minn. 439 , ; Smith v. Mason Bros. Co. 174 Minn. 94 , ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , ; Tomhave v. Galena, 180 Minn. 289 , ; Reinhard v. Universal Film Exchange, Inc. 197 Minn. 371 , ; Hill v. Umbehocker, 201 Minn. 569 , ; Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407; Lunde v. Congoleum-Nairn, Inc. 211 Minn. 487 , 1 N. W. (2d) 606 ; National Pole & Treating Co. v. Gilkey, 182 Minn. 21 , .
  • Fjellman v. Weller 7 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1942
  • Fjellman v. Weller 7 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1942
    He then has the control upon which the duty is *468 based.” Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462, 467 , , 116 A. L. R. 407.
  • Johnson v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 4 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1942
  • Johnson v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 4 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1942
    See Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407, and cases cited; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Thoirs v. Pounsford 299 N.W. 16 Minn. 1941
  • Thoirs v. Pounsford 299 N.W. 16 Minn. 1941
    Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407.
  • McDermott v. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway Co. 283 N.W. 116 Minn. 1938
  • McDermott v. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway Co. 283 N.W. 116 Minn. 1938
    Co. 124 Minn. 65 , Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. *220 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407, the issue of proximate cause was for the jury.