Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Settlement of Venteicher, 278 N.W. 581.

28 citing documents.

City of Litchfield v. TOWNSHIP OF PAYNESVILLE 103 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1960
City of Litchfield v. TOWNSHIP OF PAYNESVILLE 103 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1960
It was held in In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , , that, where a person removes from a county which *214 administers poor relief under the township system and in which he has a settlement, his settlement continues in the township in which it was at the time of his departure until he has acquired a new settlement, the required period being 1 year at that time.
County of Ramsey v. Township of Lake Henry 47 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1951
County of Ramsey v. Township of Lake Henry 47 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1951
eal and personal property in such town, village, or city for that year, the county in which the town, village, or city is situated, shall be liable for 75 per cent of the amount in excess of such one mill on the taxable value of real and personal property in such town, city, or village.” 8 In re Settlement of Schendel, 209 Minn. 466 , ; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , ; Town of Hagen v. Town of Felton, 197 Minn. 567 , ; In re Settlement of Spangler, 186 Minn. 509 , .
In Re Settlement of Peniondtz 16 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1944
City of Minneapolis v. County of St. Louis 16 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1944
City of Minneapolis v. County of St. Louis 16 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1944
In support of this *530 contention, appellant cites the cases of Township of Equality v. Township of Star, 200 Minn. 316 , , and In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , , which in substance appear to hold that the amendment was not intended to change the existing law, but rather to remove therefrom any doubt and uncertainty with respect to its provisions.
In Re Settlement of Peniondtz 16 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1944
219 , and In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , , which in substance appear to hold that the amendment was not intended to change the existing law, but rather to remove therefrom any doubt and uncertainty with respect to its provisions.
In Re Settlement of Stewart 13 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1944
City of Minneapolis v. Township of Independence 13 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1944
City of Minneapolis v. Township of Independence 13 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1944
Lucht v. Bell, 214 Minn. 318 , 8 N. W. (2d) 26 ; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , .
In Re Settlement of Stewart 13 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1944
Lucht v. Bell, 214: Minn. 318, ; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , .
Lucht v. Bell 8 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1943
Lucht v. Bell 8 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1943
1927, § 3157); In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , ; Howie v. Gangloff, 165 Minn. 346 , ; Brabec v. Boedigheimer, 132 Minn. 370 , .
In Re Settlement of Gadbaw 3 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1942
Village of Long Prairie v. Township of Burleene 3 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1942
In Re Settlement of Gadbaw 3 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1942
In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , 337 , , 585 .
Village of Long Prairie v. Township of Burleene 3 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1942
County of Marshall v. County of Anoka 2 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1942
In Re Settlement of Cramer 2 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1942
In Re Settlement of Cramer 2 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1942
618 ; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , ; In re Settlement of Johnson, 189 Minn. 161 , 248 N.W.
County of Marshall v. County of Anoka 2 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1942
*131 Appellant cites In re Settlement of Hanson, 206 Minn. 371 , ; In re Settlement of Wrobleski, 204 Minn. 264 , , 120 A. L. R. 618; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , ; In re Settlement of Johnson, 189 Minn. 161 , ; and County of Redwood v. City of Minneapolis, 126 Minn. 512 , .
Town of Swan River v. County of Chippewa 283 N.W. 399 Minn. 1939
In Re Settlement of Wrobleski 283 N.W. 399 Minn. 1939
Town of Swan River v. County of Chippewa 283 N.W. 399 Minn. 1939
In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , .
In Re Settlement of Wrobleski 283 N.W. 399 Minn. 1939
In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , .
In Re Settlement of Bendickson 281 N.W. 758 Minn. 1938
1936 Supp. § 3161); In re Settlement of Venteicher [County of Mille Lacs v. Town of Leigh] 202 Minn. 331 , , and cases there cited, furnish the guide for decision.
Township of Girard v. Village of Vining 281 N.W. 758 Minn. 1938
1936 Supp. § 3161) ; In re Settlement of Venteicher [County of Mille Lacs v. Town of Leigh] 202 Minn. 331 , , and cases there cited, furnish the guide for decision.