DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 280 N.W. 851.

26 citing documents.

  • Minn. 2021
    Smock v. Mankato Elks Club , (“Re asonable minds functioning judicially must be able to conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted by the verdict outweighs and preponderates over any other theory.”); Alling v. Nw.
  • Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
  • Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
    Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265, 266 , 280 N.W.
  • Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
  • Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
    P. & P. R. Co. 182 Minn. 307 , ; Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265 , ; Christensen v. Northern States Power Co. 222 Minn. 474 , 25 N. W. (2d) 659 ; Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 233 Minn. 171 , 46 N. W. (2d) 243 ; McDonough v. Newmans Cloak & Suit Co. 247 Minn. 250 , 77 N. W. (2d) 59 , 61 A. L. R. (2d) 100; Jeske v. George R. Wolff Holding Co. 250 Minn. 16
  • Johnson v. Lorraine Park Apts. Inc. 128 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1964
  • Johnson v. Lorraine Park Apts. Inc. 128 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1964
    Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; Anderson v. Northern States Power Co. 236 Minn. 196 , 52 N. W. (2d) 434 ; Hagsten v. Simberg, 232 Minn. 160 , 44 N. W. (2d) 611 ; State, by Burnquist, v. Paskewitz, 233 Minn. 452 , 47 N. W. (2d) 199 ; Collings v. Northwestern Hospital, 202 Minn. 139 , ; Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265 , .
  • Risnes v. Stonebreaker 110 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1961
  • Risnes v. Stonebreaker 110 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1961
    Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265 , ; Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883 ; Whitman v. Speckel, 237 Minn. 36 , 53 N. W. (2d) 558 .
  • Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
  • Jensen v. Linner 108 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1961
    See, Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265 , ; see, also, Hagsten v. Simberg, 232 Minn. 160 , 44 N. W. (2d) 611 , where the same rule is emphasized.
  • Routh v. Routh 97 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1959
  • Routh v. Routh 97 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1959
    1 Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265 , ; Greenwood v. Jack, 175 Minn. 216 , ; Nealis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry.
  • Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
  • Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
    Reasonable minds functioning judicially must be áble to conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted by the verdict outweighs and preponderates over any other theory.” See, Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265, 266 , .
  • Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc. 89 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1958
  • Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc. 89 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1958
    Many of our cases are collected in Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265, 266 , , 1 where we said: “* * * It was not necessary for the plaintiff to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis by the circumstantial evidence which she introduced, but a jury may not be permitted to guess as between two equally persuasive theories consistent with the circumstantial evidence.
  • McDonough v. Newmans Cloak & Suit Co. 77 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1956
  • McDonough v. Newmans Cloak & Suit Co. 77 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1956
    Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265 , .
  • Manteuffel v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 56 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1952
  • Manteuffel v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 56 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1952
    Seasonable minds functioning judicially must be able to conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted by the verdict outweighs and preponderates over any other theory.” Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265, 266 , .
  • Mlenek v. Fleming 27 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1947
  • Mlenek v. Fleming 27 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1947
    In Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265, 266 , , a case in which action was brought by plaintiff for damages alleged to have been caused by defendant in negligently allowing inflammable material to collect upon its floors during a New Year’s Eve party and for negligence in failing to provide receptacles for used matches and other refuse
  • Dege v. Produce Exchange Bank 2 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1942
  • Dege v. Produce Exchange Bank 2 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1942
    We think that the evidence in this case satisfies the test of the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence to support a verdict in a civil case, namely: “Reasonable minds functioning judicially must be able to conclude from the circumstances that the theory adopted by the verdict outweighs and preponderates over any other theory.” Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 203 Minn. 265, 266 , ; Sherman v. Minnesota Mut.
  • Krinke v. Timm 1 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1942