Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co., 287 N.W. 7.

29 citing documents.

Streiff v. Lungren 393 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Streiff v. Lungren 393 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co., 205 Minn. 595 , 287 N.W.
Toughill v. Melcher 179 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1970
Toughill v. Melcher 179 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1970
In Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , , a truckdriver hauled pulp wood, being compensated on a per-cord basis.
Koktavy v. City of New Prague 75 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1956
Koktavy v. City of New Prague 75 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1956
5 Bolin v. Scheurer, 210 Minn. 15 , ; Lemkuhl v. Clark, 209 Minn. 276 , ; Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Hansen v. Adent, 238 Minn. 540 , 57 N. W. (2d) 681 ; Castner v. *554 Christgau, 222 Minn. 61 , 24 N. W. (2d) 228 ; Schneider v. Salvation Army, 217 Minn. 448 , 14 N. W. (2d) 467 .
Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
Joseph’s Hospital, 212 Minn. 558 , 4 N. W. (2d) 637; Roe v. Winston, 86 Minn. 77 , Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , .
Nepstad v. Lambert 50 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1951
Nepstad v. Lambert 50 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1951
9 In Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595, 599 , , where this court was confronted with a case involving problems of both loaned servant and independent contractor, numerous cases were reviewed, and, with reference to determining whether trucks and drivers were employed in a status of independent contractor, it was stated: “The test of the rel
Sayre v. Johnson 16 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1944
Sayre v. Johnson 16 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1944
In Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595, 599 , , where this court stated the rule which is the test of relationship between employer and employe, it said: “* * * The test of the relationship is right of control.
Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons 16 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1944
Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons 16 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1944
In Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595, 599 , , this court stated the applicable rule as follows: “* * * The test of the relationship' is right of control.
Kayser v. Jungbauer 14 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1944
Kayser v. Jungbauer 14 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1944
See Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595, 599 , .
Anfinson v. A. O. U. W. Insurance Co. 3 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1942
Anfinson v. A. O. U. W. Insurance Co. 3 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1942
Bolin v. Scheurer, 210 Minn. 15, 17 , ; Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , .
Ryan v. Twin City Wholesale Grocer Co. 297 N.W. 705 Minn. 1941
Bolin v. Scheurer 297 N.W. 106 Minn. 1941
Bolin v. Scheurer 297 N.W. 106 Minn. 1941
Cf. Dahnert v. Township of Otisco, 196 Minn. 478 , ; Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595, 603 , ; Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , .
Ryan v. Twin City Wholesale Grocer Co. 297 N.W. 705 Minn. 1941
As authorities in this state appellant relies, among others, upon Dahl v. Wunderlich, 194 Minn. 35, 40 , ; Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , .
Curtis v. Hedeen 296 N.W. 495 Minn. 1941
Byhardt v. Ballord 296 N.W. 504 Minn. 1941
Byhardt v. Ballord 296 N.W. 504 Minn. 1941
Lemkuhl v. Clark, 209 Minn. 276 , ; Bushnell v. City of Duluth, 209 Minn. 27 , ; Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , .
Curtis v. Hedeen 296 N.W. 495 Minn. 1941
Tschida v. Bratt, 179 Minn. 277 , ; Moore v. Kileen & Gillis, 171 Minn. 15 , ; Ledoux v. Joncas, 163 Minn. 498 , ; Schoewe v. Winona Paint & Glass Co. 155 Minn. 4 , ; cf. Herron v. Coolsaet Bros. 158 Minn. 522 , ; Olson v. Eck’s Homemade Sausage Co. 194 Minn. 458 , ; Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595 , .
Bushnell v. City of Duluth 295 N.W. 73 Minn. 1940
Bushnell v. City of Duluth 295 N.W. 73 Minn. 1940
Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co. 205 Minn. 595, 603 , .
Sudeith v. Ryan 287 N.W. 7 Minn. 1939