Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roos v. City of Mankato, 271 N.W. 582.

42 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2024
11 originally.” (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Shaira Mattingly v. American Family Insurance, Kathleen Plasch 6 N.W.3d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Shaira Mattingly v. American Family Insurance, Kathleen Plasch 6 N.W.3d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The interpretation of “personal representative” reflected in Wood and Van Slooten is conclusive because “judicial construction of a statute, so long as it is unreversed, is as much a part thereof as if it had been written into it originally.” ().
Minn. 2023
We have long held that “[w]hen a judicial interpretation of a statute has remained undisturbed, it becomes part of the terms of the statute itself.” ().
In re the Marriage of: Marlo Renee Nelson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., ( (citing Roos v. City of Mankato, 271 N.W. 582, 584 (Minn. 1937))).
Minn. 2022
We have long held that “[w]hen a judicial interpretation of a statute has remained undisturbed, it becomes part of the terms of the statute itself.” ().
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
” ().6 6 We acknowledge that commentators have suggested that the meaning of the phrase “depraved mind” is unclear.
State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict Schmid 859 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict Schmid 859 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2015
475, 490 (1941) (“The re-enactment of a statute without change after construction of the statute by the court is an adoption of such construction and gives it the force of law.”); Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284, 288, 271 N.W.
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Sandal v. Tollman Oil Co., 298 Minn. 264, 268 , (citing Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284, 288 , 271 N.W.
In Re the Welfare of J.B. 782 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2010
In Re the Welfare of J.B. 782 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2010
ment the dictionary definition of contemporaneous construction and our opinion in Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284, 288 , 271 N.W.
Wynkoop v. Carpenter 574 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1998
Wynkoop v. Carpenter 574 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1998
See Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284, 288 , 271 N.W.
Kensinger v. Kippen 390 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kensinger v. Kippen 390 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284, 288 , 271 N.W.
Novak v. Kirby 287 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1979
Novak v. Kirby 287 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1979
Roos y. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , 271 N.W.
Sandal v. TALLMAN OIL COMPANY 214 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1974
Sandal v. TALLMAN OIL COMPANY 214 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1974
' The question raised in this case has been previously considered by us. In Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , the employer sought to vacate an award granted by the commission to a widow of a fireman who died in the course of employment by reason of an aggravation of a coronary sclerosis.
Kress v. Minneapolis-Moline Co. 102 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1960
Kress v. Minneapolis-Moline Co. 102 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1960
1 Ogren v. City of Duluth, 219 Minn. 555 , 18 N. W. (2d) 535 ; Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , ; Warner v. Zaiser, 184 Minn. 598 , .
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Schmidt 256 Minn. 64 Minn. 1959
First National Bank v. Kirschmann 97 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1959
First National Bank v. Kirschmann 97 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1959
See, Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , ; Warner v. Zaiser, 184 Minn. 598 , .
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Schmidt 256 Minn. 64 Minn. 1959
See, Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , 271 N.W.
Steward v. Industrial Commission 211 P.2d 217 Ariz. 1949
Kemling v. Armour & Co. 24 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1946
Kemling v. Armour & Co. 24 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1946
For further authorities sustaining petitioner’s position and which are nearly parallel to the situation here involved, see, Wicks v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co. 184 Minn. 540 , ; Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , ; Farrell v. M. C. Ragatz & Sons Co. 189 Minn. 573 , ; Bacher v. Herschkowitz Bros. 245 App. Div. 876 , 282 N. Y. S. 172; Moore v. Summers Drug Co. 206 N. C. 711 , 175 S. E. 96 ; Industrial Comm.
Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , ; Herzog v. City of New Ulm, 199 Minn. 352 , ; Warner v. Zaiser, 184 Minn. 598 , ; Eberle v. Miller, 170 Minn. 207 , ; Poupore v. Stone-Ordean-Wells Co. 132 Minn. 409 , .
Brown v. Minneapolis Board of Fire Underwriters 299 N.W. 14 Minn. 1941
Distinguished Brown v. Minneapolis Board of Fire Underwriters 299 N.W. 14 Minn. 1941
In Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , , we distinguished the Stanton case from previous decisions and pointed out that it does not limit or overrule them.
Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32 296 N.W. 475 Minn. 1941
Jones v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 277 N.W. 899 Minn. 1938
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones 277 N.W. 899 Minn. 1938
Jones v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 277 N.W. 899 Minn. 1938
(2 ed. & Supp. 1937) § 8936b; Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , .
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones 277 N.W. 899 Minn. 1938
(2 ed. Supp. 1937) § 8936b; Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , 271 N.W.
Herzog v. City of New Ulm 272 N.W. 174 Minn. 1937
Herzog v. City of New Ulm 272 N.W. 174 Minn. 1937
Roos v. City of Mankato, 199 Minn. 284 , ; Hawkinson v. Mirau, 196 Minn. 120 , , ; Rosenquist v. O’Neil & Preston, 187 Minn. 375 , ; Warner v. Zaiser, 184 Minn. 598 , .