Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wenger v. Wenger, 274 N.W. 517.

85 citing documents.

Allen v. Holm 66 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1954
Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Commission 61 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1953
Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Commission 61 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1953
All rights and liabilities incurred under such earlier law are preserved and may be enforced.” “* * * A reenacted statute should receive the known, settled construction which it had received when previously in force.” Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436, 440 , .
State Ex Rel. Sheffield v. City of Minneapolis 50 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1951
State Ex Rel. Sheffield v. City of Minneapolis 50 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1951
M. S. A. 645.17 (4) provides: “When a court of last resort has construed the language of a law, the legislature in subsequent laws on the same subject matter intends the same construction to be placed upon such language See, also, Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn. 208 Minn. 263 , ; Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , .
Sterling Electric Co. v. Kent 45 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1951
Sterling Electric Co. v. Kent 45 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1951
Bergin v. Washburn, 224 Minn. 269 , 28 N. W. (2d) 652 ; Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , .
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth 44 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1950
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth 44 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1950
7 Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn. 208 Minn. 263 , ; In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , ; Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , .
Welscher v. Myhre 42 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1950
Welscher v. Myhre 42 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1950
In re Estate of Cravens, 177 Minn. 437 , ; Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , ; State ex rel.
Wojahn v. Halter 39 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1949
Wojahn v. Halter 39 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1949
Respondents rely upon Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436, 441 , , where, in upholding a sentence of imprisonment for failure to make payments under a divorce decree, we said: “Disobedience of any lawful judgment, order, or process of the court is a contempt.” *382 The case is not authority here, for the simple reason that the court’s order in this case wa
State Ex Rel. Bergin v. Washburn 28 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1947
State Ex Rel. Bergin v. Washburn 28 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1947
As in Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , , relator’s position is that a revision of an existing statute is presumed not to change its meaning, even if there be alterations in the phraseology, unless such intention to change the law clearly appears from the language of the revised statute.
Paulson v. Johnson 7 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1943
Paulson v. Johnson 7 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1943
See Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , .
Daw v. Daw 4 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1942
Daw v. Daw 4 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1942
Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , , is one of our latest cases on that subject.
Dahl v. Dahl 298 N.W. 361 Minn. 1941
Dahl v. Dahl 298 N.W. 361 Minn. 1941
Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , .
Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32 296 N.W. 475 Minn. 1941
Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn. 293 N.W. 619 Minn. 1940
Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn. 293 N.W. 619 Minn. 1940
Wen-ger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , .
Jones v. Fiesel 283 N.W. 535 Minn. 1939
Jones v. Fiesel 283 N.W. 535 Minn. 1939
Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , ; Heald v. District of Columbia, 254 U. S. 20, 23 , 41 S. Ct. 42 , 65 L. ed. 106.
Butler v. Builders Trust Co. 282 N.W. 462 Minn. 1938
Butler v. Builders Trust Co. 282 N.W. 462 Minn. 1938
§ 8961; In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, supra; Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436, 439 , .
Jones v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 277 N.W. 899 Minn. 1938
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones 277 N.W. 899 Minn. 1938
Jones v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 277 N.W. 899 Minn. 1938
Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , ; Heald v. District of Columbia, 254 U. S. 20, 23 , 41 S. Ct. 42, 43 , 65 L. ed. 106.
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones 277 N.W. 899 Minn. 1938
Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , 274 N.W.
Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 276 N.W. 813 Minn. 1937
Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 276 N.W. 813 Minn. 1937
Wenger v. Wenger, 200 Minn. 436 , ; Harrington v. State ex rel.
Strom v. Lindstrom 275 N.W. 833 Minn. 1937