Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Benson v. Northland Transportation Co., 274 N.W. 532.

35 citing documents.

Caldwell v. State 347 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Caldwell v. State 347 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., 200 Minn. 445, 450 , 274 N.W.
Hamilton v. State 198 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1972
Hamilton v. State 198 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1972
Co. 200 Minn. 445, 450 , , and that identification testimony need not be positive and certain, but that it is enough for a witness to testify that it is his opinion, belief, impression, or judgment that the defendant is the person he saw commit the crime.
State v. Burch 170 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1969
State v. Burch 170 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1969
Co. 200 Minn. 445, 450 , , and that identification testimony need not be positive and certain, but that it is enough for a witness to testify that it is his opinion, belief, impression, or judgment that the defendant is the person he saw commit the crime.
Peterson v. MINNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBUNE COMPANY 164 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1969
Peterson v. MINNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBUNE COMPANY 164 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1969
Co. 200 Minn. 445, 449 , , 534: “* * * If the evidence is in equilibrio it cannot be said to preponderate in plaintiff’s favor, and therefore he has failed to sustain the burden of proof which is upon him.
Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 90 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1958
Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 90 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1958
Hentges v. Schuttler 77 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1956
Hentges v. Schuttler 77 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1956
Co. 200 Minn. 445 , ; Kavanagh v. The Golden Rule, 226 Minn. 510 , 33 N. W. (2d) 697 ; Robinson v. Butler, 234 Minn. 252 , 48 N. W. (2d) 169 ; 6 Dunnell, Supp. § 10343a; 7 Wig-more, Evidence (3 ed.) § 2034.
Waldo v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 70 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1955
Waldo v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 70 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 1955
Co. 200 Minn. 445, 450 , , 534: “It is urged that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence in that plaintiff’s case rests upon her own testimony while the defense is established by five witnesses.
Tellock v. Backholm 54 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1952
Georgopolis v. George 54 N.W.2d 137 Minn. 1952
Georgopolis v. George 54 N.W.2d 137 Minn. 1952
Robinson v. Butler 48 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1951
Robinson v. Butler 48 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1951
Kavanagh v. the Golden Rule 33 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1948
Kavanagh v. the Golden Rule 33 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 1948
Compare Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 200 Minn. 445 , .
Jacobson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 22 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1946
Jacobson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 22 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1946
Aide v. Taylor 7 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1943
Aide v. Taylor 7 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1943
Co. 200 Minn. 445, 450 , , we held, quoting 4 Wig-more, Evidence (2 ed.) p. 309, § 2034: “In general, the testimony of a single witness [the plaintiff], no matter what the issue or who ■ the person, may legally suffice as evidence upon which the jury may found a verdict.” *217 Plaintiff’s testimony cannot be rejected
State v. Soltau 2 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1942
State v. Soltau 2 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1942
Symons v. Great Northern Railway Co. 293 N.W. 303 Minn. 1940
Symons v. Great Northern Railway Co. 293 N.W. 303 Minn. 1940
Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 200 Minn. 445, 453 , 274 N..W.
Southern Pacific Co. v. Buntin 94 P.2d 639 Ariz. 1939
Hallen v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc. 281 N.W. 291 Minn. 1938
State v. Hanke 277 N.W. 364 Minn. 1938
State v. Hanke 277 N.W. 364 Minn. 1938
Butterick Publishing Co. v. Johnson 276 N.W. 277 Minn. 1937
Butterick Publishing Co. v. Johnson 276 N.W. 277 Minn. 1937
Compare Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 200 Minn. 445 , .