DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 278 N.W. 355.

38 citing documents.

  • Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    A party is not bound to return or tender money received under a fraudulent release where the adverse party pleads the release as a defense.” -66 (Minn. 1938) (emphasis omitted) (quotation omitted).
  • Tony�s Construction v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, St. Louis County Schools - ISD 2142 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Tony�s Construction v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, St. Louis County Schools - ISD 2142 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    Underwriters, (holding that the release of the insurer’s agent also released the principal from vicarious liability); Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 202 Minn. 165, 177, (stating that it is “well settled that a valid release .
  • Booth v. Gades 788 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 2010
  • Booth v. Gades 788 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 2010
    Underwriters, *708 Inc., (holding that the release of the insurer’s agent also released the principal from vicarious liability); Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 202 Minn. 165, 177 , 278 N.W.
  • Booth v. Gades 771 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Booth v. Gades 771 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    The district court also relied on a line of cases that hold that valid release of a servant releases the master, citing Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 202 Minn. 165 , 278 N.W.
  • Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project 529 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project 529 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. , 202 Minn. 165 , 183 , 278 N.W.
  • Hoffmann v. Wiltscheck 411 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Hoffmann v. Wiltscheck 411 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 202 Minn. 165, 177 , 278 N.W.
  • Carpenter v. Vreeman 409 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Carpenter v. Vreeman 409 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 202 Minn. 165, 176 , 278 N.W.
  • Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 387 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 387 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Fidelity bases its argument on Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 202 Minn. 165 , 278 N.W.
  • Stewart v. Frisch 381 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Stewart v. Frisch 381 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    “Running at large” in the context of the statute has been defined as “ ‘the permitting of any animal * * * to stroll, wander, rove or ramble at will without restraint or confinement.’ ” Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 202 Minn. 165, 180 , 278 N.W.
  • Peterson v. Pawelk 263 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1978
  • Peterson v. Pawelk 263 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1978
    t large of any such domestic animal shall be liable to the person aggrieved for treble damages sustained by him, to be recovered in a civil action brought for that purpose.” “Running at large” in the context of the statute has been defined as “ ‘the permitting of any animal * * * to stroll, wander, rove or ramble at will without restraint or confinement.’ ” Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co., 202 Minn. 165, 180 , 278 N.W.
  • Pigman v. Nott 233 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1975
  • Pigman v. Nott 233 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 1975
    “Any person who shall knowingly permit the running at large of any such domestic animal shall be liable to the person aggrieved for treble damages sustained by him, to be recovered in a civil action brought for that purpose.” In Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165 , this statute was held applicable to a situation where, as here, the plaintiff’s damages resulted from a collision between the vehicle in which she was a passenger and defendant’s unattended horse.
  • Schmidt v. Smith 216 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1974
  • Schmidt v. Smith 216 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1974
    In Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165, 174 , , 117 A. L. R. 1009, 1015 (1938), this court stated: “It is settled law in this state and elsewhere that, at least in the absence of express provisions to the contrary, a settlement for known injuries does not bar a later action for existing but unknown ones, there being mutual mistake as to
  • Doud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 107 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1961
  • Doud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 107 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1961
    *349 Co. 118 Minn. 437 , ; Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165 , , 117 A. L. R. 1009; McGovern v. Lutz, 242 Minn. 397 , 65 N. W. (2d) 637 .
  • Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 90 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1958
  • Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 90 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1958
    11 Cf. Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165, 181 , , 117 A. L. R. 1009.
  • Allison v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 62 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1954
  • Allison v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 62 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1954
    3 For Minnesota decisions expressing this rule, see Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165 , , 117 A. L. R. 1009; Rase v. M. St.
  • Aronovitch v. Levy 56 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1953
  • Aronovitch v. Levy 56 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1953
    Co. 147 Minn. 109 , .” In Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165, 174 , , 117 A. L. R. 1009, we said: “It is settled law in this state and elsewhere that, at least in the absence of express provisions to the contrary, a settlement for known injuries does not bar a later action for existing but unknown ones, there being mutual mistake as to the latter.
  • Benesh v. Garvais 20 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 1945
  • Benesh v. Garvais 20 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 1945
    § 136.” This rule was followed and applied in Fields v. Mankato E. T. Co. 116 Minn. 218 , ; Pederson v. Eppard, 181 Minn. 47 , ; Smith v. Mann, 184 Minn. 485 , ; Ahlsted v. Hart, 201 Minn. 82 , ; Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165, 186 , , 117 A. L. R. 1009; McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co. 206 Minn. 1, 9 , -862 ; Driessen v. Moening, 208 Minn. 356, 360 , ; Philips v. Aretz, 215 Minn. 325, 328 , 10 N. W. (2d) 226, 228 .
  • Schau v. Buss 295 N.W. 910 Minn. 1940
  • Schau v. Buss 295 N.W. 910 Minn. 1940
    1927, § 9181; Kavli v. Leifman, 207 Minn. 549 , ; cf. Schaefer v. Thoeny, 199 Minn. 610, 617 , ; Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165, 185 , , 117 A. L. R. 1009.
  • Hoge v. Teegarden 279 N.W. 401 Minn. 1938
  • Hoge v. Teegarden 279 N.W. 401 Minn. 1938
    Finney v. Norwood, 198 Minn. 554 , ; Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co. 202 Minn. 165 , .