Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Green v. Schmahl, 278 N.W. 157.
- Bertsch v. Varnum Lumber & Fuel Co. 228 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1975
-
Bertsch v. Varnum Lumber & Fuel Co.
228 N.W.2d 228
Minn. 1975
In Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254, 256 , we made the following observation: «* * * [Sjporadic competence, occasional, intermittent, and much limited capacity to earn something somehow, does not reduce what is otherwise total to a partial disability.
- Morrison v. Merrick's Super Market, Inc. 220 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1974
-
Morrison v. Merrick's Super Market, Inc.
220 N.W.2d 344
Minn. 1974
We have examined the record and cannot say that the findings of the compensation judge are manifestly contrary to the evidence, nor are they inconsistent with the rule for determining total disability stated by us in Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254
- Stroncek v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company 193 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1971
-
Stroncek v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company
193 N.W.2d 286
Minn. 1971
Co. 187 Minn. 462 , ]” Following that decision, and through the years, this court has constructed an elaborate framework in defining the words “total disability.” In Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254, 256 , we again repeated that “although an injured person may be able to perform some parts of an occupation he may be held to be totally disabled unless he is able to perform the substantial and material parts of some gainful work or occupation with reasonable continuity.” Lee v. Minneapoli
- McCrae v. Brandt Aero Service 168 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1969
-
McCrae v. Brandt Aero Service
168 N.W.2d 683
Minn. 1969
The criteria for determining total disability are found in Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254, 256 , , where we said: *487 “* * * We chose rather to hold that ‘although an injured person may be able to perform some parts of an occupation he may be held to be totally disabled unless he is able to perform the substantial and material parts of some gainful work or occupation with reasonable con
- Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1967
-
Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
153 N.W.2d 130
Minn. 1967
Co. 230 Minn. 315 , 41 N. W. (2d) 433 ; Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254 , .
- Day v. Zenith Paper Stock and Rag Company 134 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1965
-
Day v. Zenith Paper Stock and Rag Company
134 N.W.2d 4
Minn. 1965
estimony of an experienced employment supervisor — is both material and relevant in determining whether the employe’s disability is of such a character that he has no reasonable likelihood, while such disability continues, of being able to obtain and pursue an income-yielding occupation with reasonable continuity * * See, also, Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266 ; Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254 , ; Olson v. Griffin Wheel Co. 218 Mum.
- Petter v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 133 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1965
-
Petter v. K. W. McKee, Inc.
133 N.W.2d 638
Minn. 1965
Co. 187 Minn. 462 , ; Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254 , .
- Roberts v. Motor Cargo, Inc. 104 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1960
-
Roberts v. Motor Cargo, Inc.
104 N.W.2d 546
Minn. 1960
The applicable rule is found in Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254, 256 , , where we said: “ ‘We have consistently held that total permanent disability does not mean a state of absolute helplessness.
- Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co. 100 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1959
-
Richter v. Shoppe Plumbing & Heating Co.
100 N.W.2d 96
Minn. 1959
The applicable rule is found in *113 Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254, 256 , , where we said: “We have consistently held that total permanent disability does not mean a state of absolute helplessness.
- Casey v. Northern States Power Co. 77 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1956
-
Casey v. Northern States Power Co.
77 N.W.2d 67
Minn. 1956
Cf. Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266 ; Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254 , .
- Castle v. City of Stillwater 51 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1952
-
Castle v. City of Stillwater
51 N.W.2d 370
Minn. 1952
Berg v. Sadler, 235 Minn. 214 , 50 N. W. (2d) 266 ; Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254 , ; see, Lee v. Minneapolis St.
- Berg v. Sadler 50 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1951
-
Berg v. Sadler
50 N.W.2d 266
Minn. 1951
Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254 , ; Lorentz v. Aetna L. Ins.
- Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 41 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1950
-
Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
41 N.W.2d 433
Minn. 1950
Co. 187 Minn. 462 , ; Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254 , .
- Baker v. MacGillis Gibbs Co. 13 N.W.2d 457 Minn. 1944
-
Baker v. MacGillis Gibbs Co.
13 N.W.2d 457
Minn. 1944
See Green v. Schmahl, 202 Minn. 254 , .