Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Swenson v. Board of Christian Service, 277 N.W. 529.

16 citing documents.

In Re Estate of Janecek 610 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2000
See generally Swensen v. Board of Christian Science (In re Estate of Peterson), 202 Minn. 31, 39-40
Bush v. Arrowood 198 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1972
In re Estate of Quinlan, 233 Minn. 35, 40 , 45 * In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31, 37
In Re Estate of Lutzi 266 Minn. 294 Minn. 1963
9 ; In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , ; Radintz v. Northwestern Nat.
North Star Rifle Club, Inc. v. Junior United Sportsman's Rifle Club 123 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 1963
In re Estate of Lundquist, 193 Minn. 474 , ; In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , ; Radintz v. Northwestern Nat.
In Re Estate of Rowe 113 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1962
2 In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , 40 , , 534 .
In Re Estate of Dahl 249 Minn. 156 Minn. 1957
11 ; In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , .
Iverson v. Johnson 81 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1957
Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , ; In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , .
Stoppel v. Red River Valley Conference 57 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1953
Thus, *364 in In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31, 36 , , we stated: “* * * we hold, in line with many courts, that a devise or bequest, although in form an outright gift, yet when made to an institution whose sole reason for existence and whose entire activity is charitable, is in purpose and practical effect a charitable trust.
Vesey v. Vesey 53 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1952
3 In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Lahiff 45 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1951
State v. Lahiff 45 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1951
§ 501.12; In re Estate of Lundquist, 193 Minn. 474 , ; In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , ; 14 Minn. L. Rev. 587 ; 23 Minn. L. Rev. 670 ; 2 Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, § 322, pp. 1025-1026.
Stevens v. Carlsen 27 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1947
As this court said in In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 81, 40 , , relative to appeals from probate court: “* * * district court has jurisdiction only where the right of appeal has been exercised pursuant to statutory direction.
In Re Estate of Stevens 27 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1947
As this court said in In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , 40 , , 534 , relative to appeals from probate court: "* * * The district court has jurisdiction only where the right of appeal has been exercised pursuant to statutory direction.
Fairmont Community Hospital Assn. Inc. v. State 21 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1945
See, In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , ; Brown v. Maplewood Cemetery Assn. 85 Minn. 498 , ; Sherman v. Richmond Hose Co. No. 2, 230 N. Y. 462 , 130 N. E. 613 ; Centennial and Memorial Assn. of Valley Forge, 235 Pa.
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court 283 N.W. 545 Minn. 1938
“Parties cannot confer jurisdiction by consent upon a court of any subject-matter, which is denied to it by law; * " *” Chandler v. Kent, 8 Minn. 479 , 483 (536); In re Estate of Borlaug, 201 Minn. 407, 411, 412 , ; In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , ; Gjerstadengen v. G. W. Van Duzen & Co. 7 N. D. 612 , , 66 A. S. R. 679.
In Re Estate of Peterson 277 N.W. 529 Minn. 1938