DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite County of Mille Lacs v. Town of Leigh, 278 N.W. 581.

18 citing documents.

  • City of Litchfield v. TOWNSHIP OF PAYNESVILLE 103 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1960
    It was held in In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , , that, where a person removes from a county which *214 administers poor relief under the township system and in which he has a settlement, his settlement continues in the township in which it was at the time of his departure until he has acquired a new settlement, the required period being 1 year at t
  • County of Ramsey v. Township of Lake Henry 47 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1951
    xable value of real and personal property in such town, village, or city for that year, the county in which the town, village, or city is situated, shall be liable for 75 per cent of the amount in excess of such one mill on the taxable value of real and personal property in such town, city, or village.” 8 In re Settlement of Schendel, 209 Minn. 466 , ; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , ; Town of Hagen v. Town of Felton, 197 Minn. 567 , ; In re Settlement of Spangler, 186 Minn. 509
  • City of Minneapolis v. County of St. Louis 16 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1944
    In support of this *530 contention, appellant cites the cases of Township of Equality v. Township of Star, 200 Minn. 316 , , and In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , , which in substance appear to hold that the amendment was not intended to change the existing law, but rather to remove therefrom any doubt and uncertainty with respect to its provisions.
  • In Re Settlement of Peniondtz 16 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1944
    219 , and In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , 278 N.W.
  • City of Minneapolis v. Township of Independence 13 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1944
    Lucht v. Bell, 214 Minn. 318 , 8 N. W. (2d) 26 ; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , .
  • In Re Settlement of Stewart 13 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1944
    Lucht v. Bell, 214: Minn. 318, ; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , 278 N.W.
  • Lucht v. Bell 8 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1943
    1927, § 3157); In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , ; Howie v. Gangloff, 165 Minn. 346 , ; Brabec v. Boedigheimer, 132 Minn. 370 , .
  • In Re Settlement of Gadbaw 3 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1942
    In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , 337 , 278 N.W.
  • Village of Long Prairie v. Township of Burleene 3 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1942
    “The year contemplated by the statute is the year ending the last day of the month immediately preceding the month in which aid is applied for and granted.” In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 ,.
  • In Re Settlement of Cramer 2 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1942
    618 ; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , 278 N.W.
  • County of Marshall v. County of Anoka 2 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1942
    *131 Appellant cites In re Settlement of Hanson, 206 Minn. 371 , ; In re Settlement of Wrobleski, 204 Minn. 264 , , 120 A. L. R. 618; In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , ; In re Settlement of Johnson, 189 Minn. 161 , ; and County of Redwood v. City of Minneapolis, 126 Minn. 512 , .
  • Town of Swan River v. County of Chippewa 283 N.W. 399 Minn. 1939
    In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , .
  • In Re Settlement of Wrobleski 283 N.W. 399 Minn. 1939
    In re Settlement of Venteicher, 202 Minn. 331 , 278 N.W.
  • In Re Settlement of Bendickson 281 N.W. 758 Minn. 1938
  • Township of Girard v. Village of Vining 281 N.W. 758 Minn. 1938
  • In Re Settlement of Bendickson 281 N.W. 758 Minn. 1938
    1936 Supp. § 3161); In re Settlement of Venteicher [County of Mille Lacs v. Town of Leigh] 202 Minn. 331 , 278 N.W.
  • Township of Girard v. Village of Vining 281 N.W. 758 Minn. 1938
    1936 Supp. § 3161) ; In re Settlement of Venteicher [County of Mille Lacs v. Town of Leigh] 202 Minn. 331 , , and cases there cited, furnish the guide for decision.
  • In Re Settlement of Venteicher 278 N.W. 581 Minn. 1938